Pahapill Peter A
Neuromodulation. 2015 Aug;18(6):472-6; discussion 476-7. doi: 10.1111/ner.12283. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) revision surgery remains common, with a negative impact on cost-effectiveness and outcomes. The primary goal of this report was to retrospectively study the need for revision surgery in a cohort of complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-1) patients with newly implanted cervical surgical paddle leads, focusing on a method of implantation to reduce the need for revision surgery.
Fifteen patients underwent implantation of paddle SCS leads in the cervical spine with cervical laminotomies under conscious sedation for CRPS-1 from 2008 to 2012. Electrodes were not anchored and 11 of the electrodes were three-column paddle leads. A disinterested third party performed initial chart reviews, supplemented by subsequent telephone interviews. The need for revision surgery was the endpoint. A single surgeon performed all implants with a consistent method.
There were no paddle electrode lead revisions required for suboptimal lead placement, fracture, migration, or infection at a median follow-up period of 22 months.
This study is the first to report on: 1) cervical electrode implantation with no anchoring; and 2) cervical paddle lead implantation (including three-column paddles) performed under conscious sedation. The specific method of nonanchoring of the paddle implants under conscious sedation may have contributed to low electrode lead revision rates.
脊髓刺激(SCS)翻修手术仍然很常见,对成本效益和治疗结果有负面影响。本报告的主要目的是回顾性研究一组新植入颈椎手术片状电极导线的Ⅰ型复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS-1)患者的翻修手术需求,重点关注一种可减少翻修手术需求的植入方法。
2008年至2012年期间,15例因CRPS-1在清醒镇静下接受颈椎椎板切开术并植入颈椎片状SCS导线的患者。电极未进行固定,其中11根电极是三柱片状导线。由一位不相关的第三方进行初始病历审查,并辅以随后的电话访谈。翻修手术需求为观察终点。所有植入手术均由一位外科医生采用一致的方法进行。
在中位随访期22个月时,未因电极放置欠佳、骨折、移位或感染而需要进行片状电极导线翻修。
本研究首次报告了:1)未进行固定的颈椎电极植入;2)在清醒镇静下进行的颈椎片状导线植入(包括三柱片状导线)。清醒镇静下片状植入物不进行固定的特定方法可能是电极导线翻修率低的原因。