Møller U, Keiding N, Hougaard P
Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol. 1985;48(2):119-33.
An in vivo study of the hamster cheek pouch epithelium using the stathmokinetic technique (Colcemid) demonstrated a circadian variation in mitotic influx. Based on measurements of all nucleated epithelial cells the diurnal mean was estimated in two separate experiments as 0.34%/h +/- 0.02 (SE) and 0.27%/h +/- 0.02 (SE) respectively. 3HTdR was injected in the latter study (a double labelling experiment). The significant difference between the two experiments is, however, probably due to biological variations. The maximal values for the mitotic rate were found during the light (resting) period, as were the maximal values for the mitotic index. The mean mitotic influx for the 'light period' was estimated as 0.5-0.4%/h, and for the 'dark period' as 0.2%/h. Independent analyses demonstrated the necessity of a circadian-dependent correction of the 1 and 4 h values of accumulated metaphases. The 1 h value was significantly too high during the light as well as the dark period. The 4 h value was found to be too low, but only significantly so during the dark period. Basing the estimation of mitotic rate on the 3 h accumulation value produced only very similar results to those found by using all four accumulation periods. The use of overlapping experiments proved that only cells entering mitosis after Colcemid application were arrested, so that when arrested metaphases were counted the accumulation line was correctly drawn through the origin. In the latter study (the double labelling experiment) both S- (Møller and Keiding 1982) and mitotic influx were estimated, the estimates being 0.55%/h +/- 0.03 (SE) and 0.27%/h +/- 0.02 (SE) respectively. Even considering possible methodological problems, the discrepancy between the S efflux and the mitotic influx indicates cell death and/or differentiation from G2.
一项使用有丝分裂抑制技术(秋水仙酰胺)对仓鼠颊囊上皮进行的体内研究表明,有丝分裂流入存在昼夜节律变化。基于对所有有核上皮细胞的测量,在两个独立实验中,日均值分别估计为0.34%/小时±0.02(标准误)和0.27%/小时±0.02(标准误)。在后一项研究(双标记实验)中注射了3HTdR。然而,这两个实验之间的显著差异可能是由于生物学变异。有丝分裂率的最大值出现在光照(休息)期,有丝分裂指数的最大值也是如此。“光照期”的平均有丝分裂流入估计为0.5 - 0.4%/小时,“黑暗期”为0.2%/小时。独立分析表明,对于累积中期的1小时和4小时值,有必要进行昼夜节律依赖性校正。1小时值在光照期和黑暗期都显著过高。4小时值被发现过低,但仅在黑暗期显著过低。基于3小时累积值估计有丝分裂率,得到的结果与使用所有四个累积期得到的结果非常相似。重叠实验证明,只有在应用秋水仙酰胺后进入有丝分裂的细胞才会被阻断,因此当对阻断的中期进行计数时,累积线是通过原点正确绘制的。在后一项研究(双标记实验)中,同时估计了S期(Møller和Keiding,1982)和有丝分裂流入,估计值分别为0.55%/小时±0.03(标准误)和0.27%/小时±0.02(标准误)。即使考虑到可能的方法学问题,S期流出和有丝分裂流入之间的差异表明细胞死亡和/或从G2期开始分化。