Ramberger Melanie, Peschl Patrick, Schanda Kathrin, Irschick Regina, Höftberger Romana, Deisenhammer Florian, Rostásy Kevin, Berger Thomas, Dalmau Josep, Reindl Markus
Clinical Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Division of Neuroanatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0122037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122037. eCollection 2015.
N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is an autoimmune neurological disease, diagnosed by a specific autoantibody against NMDAR. Antibody testing using commercially available cell-based assays (CBA) or immunohistochemistry on rat brain tissue has proven high specificity and sensitivity. Here we compare an immunofluorescence live CBA to a flow cytometry (FACS) based assay to detect NMDAR antibodies by their binding to the surface of HEK293A cells functionally expressing NMDAR. Both assays were first established using a discovery group of 76 individuals and then validated in a group of 32 patients in a blinded manner. In the CBA, 23 of 23 patients with NMDAR encephalitis were positive for NMDAR antibodies and 0 of 85 controls (32 healthy controls and 53 patients with other neurological diseases), resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 100% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 85.1-100.0 and 95.7-100.0, respectively). The FACS based assay detected NMDAR antibodies in 20 of 23 patients and in 0 of 85 controls. Therefore, with an equally high specificity (95% CI 95.7-100.0) the sensitivity of the FACS based assay was 87% (95% CI 66.4-97.2). Comparing antibody titers from CBA with delta median fluorescence intensities from FACS showed a high concordance (kappa = 0.943, p<0.0001) and correlation (r = 0.697, p<0.0001). In conclusion, evaluation of the FACS based assay revealed a lower sensitivity and high inter-assay variation, making the CBA a more reliable detection method.
N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体(NMDAR)脑炎是一种自身免疫性神经疾病,通过针对NMDAR的特异性自身抗体进行诊断。使用市售的基于细胞的检测方法(CBA)或大鼠脑组织免疫组织化学进行抗体检测已证明具有高特异性和敏感性。在这里,我们将免疫荧光活细胞CBA与基于流式细胞术(FACS)的检测方法进行比较,以通过NMDAR抗体与功能性表达NMDAR的HEK293A细胞表面的结合来检测NMDAR抗体。两种检测方法首先使用76名个体的发现组建立,然后以盲法在32名患者组中进行验证。在CBA中,23例NMDAR脑炎患者中有23例NMDAR抗体呈阳性,85名对照(32名健康对照和53名其他神经疾病患者)中有0例呈阳性,敏感性和特异性分别为100%(95%置信区间(CI)分别为85.1-100.0和95.7-100.0)。基于FACS的检测方法在23例患者中的20例中检测到NMDAR抗体,在85名对照中检测到0例。因此,基于FACS的检测方法具有同样高的特异性(95%CI 95.7-100.0),其敏感性为87%(95%CI 66.4-97.2)。将CBA的抗体滴度与FACS的δ中位荧光强度进行比较,显示出高度一致性(kappa = 0.943,p<0.0001)和相关性(r = 0.697,p<0.0001)。总之,对基于FACS的检测方法的评估显示其敏感性较低且检测间差异较大,使得CBA成为一种更可靠的检测方法。