Tighe Elizabeth L, Wagner Richard K, Schatschneider Christopher
Florida State University.
Read Writ. 2015 Apr 1;28(4):439-466. doi: 10.1007/s11145-014-9532-1.
This study demonstrates the utility of applying a causal indicator modeling framework to investigate important predictors of reading comprehension in third, seventh, and tenth grade students. The results indicated that a 4-factor multiple indicator multiple indicator cause (MIMIC) model of reading comprehension provided adequate fit at each grade level. This model included latent predictor constructs of decoding, verbal reasoning, nonverbal reasoning, and working memory and accounted for a large portion of the reading comprehension variance (73% to 87%) across grade levels. Verbal reasoning contributed the most unique variance to reading comprehension at all grade levels. In addition, we fit a multiple group 4-factor MIMIC model to investigate the relative stability (or variability) of the predictor contributions to reading comprehension across development (i.e., grade levels). The results revealed that the contributions of verbal reasoning, nonverbal reasoning, and working memory to reading comprehension were stable across the three grade levels. Decoding was the only predictor that could not be constrained to be equal across grade levels. The contribution of decoding skills to reading comprehension was higher in third grade and then remained relatively stable between seventh and tenth grade. These findings illustrate the feasibility of using MIMIC models to explain individual differences in reading comprehension across the development of reading skills.
本研究展示了应用因果指标建模框架来探究三年级、七年级和十年级学生阅读理解重要预测因素的效用。结果表明,阅读理解的四因素多指标多因(MIMIC)模型在每个年级水平都提供了充分的拟合。该模型包括解码、言语推理、非言语推理和工作记忆的潜在预测因素结构,并解释了各年级水平阅读理解方差的很大一部分(73%至87%)。言语推理在所有年级水平对阅读理解贡献的独特方差最大。此外,我们拟合了一个多组四因素MIMIC模型,以研究预测因素对阅读理解的贡献在整个发展过程(即年级水平)中的相对稳定性(或变异性)。结果显示,言语推理、非言语推理和工作记忆对阅读理解的贡献在三个年级水平上是稳定的。解码是唯一不能在各年级水平上被约束为相等的预测因素。解码技能对阅读理解的贡献在三年级较高,然后在七年级和十年级之间保持相对稳定。这些发现说明了使用MIMIC模型来解释阅读技能发展过程中阅读理解个体差异的可行性。