Suppr超能文献

心力衰竭患者为中心的疾病管理(PCDM)研究的主要结果:一项随机临床试验。

Primary Results of the Patient-Centered Disease Management (PCDM) for Heart Failure Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Research, Geriatrics, Ambulatory Care, and Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver2Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine at the Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora3Denver-Seattle Center of Innovatio.

Research, Geriatrics, Ambulatory Care, and Cardiology, Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver3Denver-Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Denver, Colorado.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):725-32. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0315.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Heart failure (HF) has a major effect on patients' health status, including their symptom burden, functional status, and health-related quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of a collaborative care patient-centered disease management (PCDM) intervention to improve the health status of patients with HF.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Patient-Centered Disease Management (PCDM) trial was a multisite randomized clinical trial comparing a collaborative care PCDM intervention with usual care in patients with HF. A population-based sample of 392 patients with an HF diagnosis from 4 Veterans Affairs centers who had a Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) overall summary score of less than 60 (heavy symptom burden and impaired functional status and quality of life) were enrolled between May 2009 and June 2011.

INTERVENTIONS

The PCDM intervention included collaborative care by a multidisciplinary care team consisting of a nurse coordinator, cardiologist, psychiatrist, and primary care physician; home telemonitoring and patient self-management support; and screening and treatment for comorbid depression.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was change in the KCCQ overall summary score at 1 year (a 5-point change is clinically significant). Mortality, hospitalization, and depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire 9) were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between patients randomized to the PCDM intervention (n=187) vs usual care (n=197); baseline mean KCCQ overall summary scores were 37.9 vs 36.9 (P=.48). There was significant improvement in the KCCQ overall summary scores in both groups after 1 year (mean change, 13.5 points in each group), with no significant difference between groups (P=.97). The intervention was not associated with greater improvement in the KCCQ overall summary scores when the effect over time was estimated using 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month data (P=.74). Among secondary outcomes, there were significantly fewer deaths at 1 year in the intervention arm (8 of 187 [4.3%]) than in the usual care arm (19 of 197 [9.6%]) (P = .04). Among those who screened positive for depression, there was a greater improvement in the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 scores after 1 year in the intervention arm than in the usual care arm (2.1 points lower, P=.01). There was no significant difference in 1-year hospitalization rates between the intervention arm and the usual care arm (29.4% vs 29.9%, P=.87).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This multisite randomized trial of a multifaceted HF PCDM intervention did not demonstrate improved patient health status compared with usual care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00461513.

摘要

重要性:心力衰竭(HF)对患者的健康状况有重大影响,包括其症状负担、功能状态和健康相关生活质量。

目的:确定协作式护理以患者为中心的疾病管理(PCDM)干预措施在改善 HF 患者健康状况方面的有效性。

设计、地点和参与者:以患者为中心的疾病管理(PCDM)试验是一项多站点随机临床试验,比较了协作式护理 PCDM 干预措施与 HF 患者的常规护理。该研究从 4 个退伍军人事务中心招募了 392 名 HF 诊断患者,这些患者的堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(KCCQ)总体评分低于 60 分(症状负担重、功能状态和生活质量受损),他们是基于人群的样本,于 2009 年 5 月至 2011 年 6 月间入组。

干预措施:PCDM 干预措施包括由多学科护理团队提供的协作护理,该团队由护士协调员、心脏病专家、精神科医生和初级保健医生组成;家庭远程监测和患者自我管理支持;以及共病抑郁的筛查和治疗。

主要结局和测量:主要结局为 1 年时 KCCQ 总体评分的变化(5 分的变化具有临床意义)。死亡率、住院率和抑郁症状(患者健康问卷 9)为次要结局。

结果:随机分配到 PCDM 干预组(n=187)和常规护理组(n=197)的患者在基线特征方面无显著差异;基线 KCCQ 总体评分分别为 37.9 分和 36.9 分(P=.48)。两组在 1 年后 KCCQ 总体评分均有显著改善(每组平均变化 13.5 分),两组间无显著差异(P=.97)。当使用 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月的数据估计随时间的效应时,干预措施与 KCCQ 总体评分的改善无关(P=.74)。在次要结局中,干预组的 1 年死亡率(8/187 [4.3%])明显低于常规护理组(19/197 [9.6%])(P = .04)。在筛查出患有抑郁症的患者中,干预组的患者健康问卷 9 评分在 1 年后有较大改善(低 2.1 分,P=.01)。干预组和常规护理组的 1 年住院率无显著差异(29.4% vs 29.9%,P=.87)。

结论和相关性:这项多站点随机试验对多方面的 HF PCDM 干预措施进行了研究,与常规护理相比,该干预措施并未显示出改善患者健康状况的效果。

试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00461513。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验