Moll Keran, Sun Shawn X, Ellis Jeffrey J, Howe Andrew, Amin Alpesh
Comprehensive Health Insights, Inc., Humana, Louisville, KY, USA.
Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Forest Laboratories, LLC, an affiliate of Actavis, Inc., Jersey City, NJ, USA.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Mar 16;10:565-76. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S79025. eCollection 2015.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations are associated with declining lung function and health-related quality of life, and increased hospitalization and mortality. Clinical trials often poorly represent the elderly and thus have only partial applicability to their clinical care.
To compare exacerbations, COPD-related health care utilization (HCU), and costs in a predominantly elderly Medicare COPD population initiated on roflumilast versus those not initiated on roflumilast.
Deidentified administrative claims data from a large, national payer were utilized. Medicare patients aged 40-89 years with at least one COPD diagnosis from May 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012 were included. Members with at least one roflumilast pharmacy claim (index) were assigned to the roflumilast group and those without were assigned to the non-roflumilast group. Proxy index dates for the non-roflumilast group were randomly assigned for similar distribution of all patients' time at risk. Subjects with at least one pre-index COPD exacerbation had to be continuously enrolled for ≥365 days pre-index and post-index. Unadjusted and adjusted difference-in-difference (DID) analyses contrasted pre-index with post-index changes in exacerbations, HCU, and costs of roflumilast treatment compared with non-roflumilast treatment.
A total of 500 roflumilast and 60,145 non-roflumilast patients were included (mean age 69.7 and 72.3 years, respectively; P<0.0001). Unadjusted DID favored roflumilast for all exacerbations, with greater pre-index to post-index reductions in mean per 30-day COPD-related hospitalizations (-0.0182 versus -0.0013, P=0.009), outpatient visits (-0.2500 versus -0.0606, P<0.0001), and COPD-related inpatient costs (-US$141 versus -US$11, P=0.0346) and outpatient costs (-US$31 versus -US$4, P<0.0001). Multivariate analyses identified significantly improved pre-index to post-index COPD-related total costs (P=0.0005) and total exacerbations (P<0.0001) for the roflumilast group versus non-roflumilast group.
In a predominantly elderly Medicare COPD population, newly initiated roflumilast patients displayed similar or significantly better unadjusted reductions in all exacerbation-related, COPD-related HCU-related, and COPD-related costs outcomes compared with non-roflumilast patients. These analyses also suggest better adjusted COPD-related costs and total exacerbations for roflumilast-initiated patients.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重与肺功能下降、健康相关生活质量降低以及住院率和死亡率增加有关。临床试验往往不能很好地代表老年人,因此仅部分适用于他们的临床护理。
比较在以老年人为主的医疗保险COPD人群中,开始使用罗氟司特的患者与未开始使用罗氟司特的患者的急性加重情况、COPD相关医疗保健利用(HCU)及费用。
使用来自一个大型全国性医保机构的匿名行政索赔数据。纳入2010年5月1日至2012年12月31日期间年龄在40 - 89岁且至少有一次COPD诊断的医疗保险患者。至少有一次罗氟司特药房索赔记录(索引)的成员被分配到罗氟司特组,没有的则被分配到非罗氟司特组。为使所有患者的风险时间分布相似,随机为非罗氟司特组分配替代索引日期。至少有一次索引前COPD急性加重的受试者在索引前和索引后必须连续登记≥365天。未调整和调整后的差异分析对比了索引前与索引后罗氟司特治疗与非罗氟司特治疗在急性加重、HCU及费用方面的变化。
共纳入500例罗氟司特患者和60145例非罗氟司特患者(平均年龄分别为69.7岁和72.3岁;P < 0.0001)。未调整的差异分析显示,在所有急性加重情况方面罗氟司特更具优势,每30天COPD相关住院的平均减少量从索引前到索引后更大(-0.0182对-0.0013,P = 0.009),门诊就诊次数(-0.2500对-0.0606,P < 0.0001),以及COPD相关住院费用(-141美元对-11美元,P = 0.0346)和门诊费用(-31美元对-4美元,P < 0.0001)。多变量分析表明,与非罗氟司特组相比,罗氟司特组索引前到索引后COPD相关总费用(P = 0.0005)和总急性加重次数(P < 0.0001)有显著改善。
在以老年人为主的医疗保险COPD人群中,新开始使用罗氟司特的患者与未使用罗氟司特的患者相比,在所有与急性加重相关、COPD相关HCU相关及COPD相关费用结果方面,未调整的减少情况相似或显著更好。这些分析还表明,使用罗氟司特的患者在调整后的COPD相关费用和总急性加重次数方面表现更好。