Pervez S, Kirkland S C, Epenetos A A, Mooi W J, Evans D J, Krausz T
Department of Histopathology, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Int J Cancer. 1989 Nov 15;44(5):940-7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910440532.
Two monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) AUAI and HMFGI recognize antigens located on different membrane domains of polarized epithelial cells. We have assessed the accessibility of these antigens in multicellular tumour spheroids produced in culture using a well-polarized (HRA-19) and a non-polarized cell line (LoVo) of human large-bowel carcinoma origin. Multicellular spheroids of HRA-19 cells develop polarity, so that the membrane which is in contact with the culture medium (apical) becomes antigenically distinct from the membrane facing the centre of the spheroids (basolateral). This was confirmed by immunostaining sections of spheroids with 2 MAbs, AUAI and HMFGI. AUAI recognizes an antigen located exclusively on the basolateral membranes of polarized epithelial cells, and stained only internal membranes in spheroid sections. Conversely HMFGI, which recognizes an antigen located on the apical membranes, stained only the periphery of the spheroids. These 2MAbs were then radiolabelled with 125I and incubated with live spheroids for 4 hr at 37 degrees C. Autoradiographs of spheroid sections showed a marked difference between the 2 MAbs. 125I-HMFGI-radioantibody localized exclusively on the spheroid surface in a pattern identical to the in vitro immunostaining pattern, while 125I-AUAI radioantibody showed no binding in spite of the uniform presence of antigen on all tumour cells basolaterally. This appeared to be the result of the inaccessibility of basolateral antigenic sites in well-polarized epithelial cells because of the tight junctions connecting these cells at their apical surfaces. In contrast to the HRA-19 cell line LoVo, spheroids do not develop polarity; as a result, when stained with AUAI, variable antigenic expression all over the cell surface was seen. Autoradiographs of these spheroids showed 125I-AUAI binding with a penetration to a depth of about 1-3 cells, while HMFGI which shows no reactivity with this cell line in vitro, did not bind. This phenomenon was further investigated in xenografts of the HRA-19 cell line. It was shown that in a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma where the tumour cells forming acini are arranged in a polarized fashion, the luminal antigenic sites may be inaccessible to the injected MAb. The striking differences in binding of MAbs on polarized and unpolarized tumours indicate the importance of cell polarization and exact location of antigenic sites for in vivo immunotargeting.
两种单克隆抗体(MAbs)AUAI和HMFGI识别位于极化上皮细胞不同膜结构域上的抗原。我们使用源自人结肠癌的极化良好的(HRA - 19)和非极化细胞系(LoVo),评估了这些抗原在培养产生的多细胞肿瘤球体中的可及性。HRA - 19细胞的多细胞球体形成极性,使得与培养基接触的膜(顶端)在抗原性上与面向球体中心的膜(基底外侧)不同。用两种单克隆抗体AUAI和HMFGI对球体切片进行免疫染色证实了这一点。AUAI识别仅位于极化上皮细胞基底外侧膜上的抗原,并且仅对球体切片中的内部膜进行染色。相反,识别位于顶端膜上抗原的HMFGI仅对球体的周边进行染色。然后将这两种单克隆抗体用125I进行放射性标记,并在37℃下与活的球体孵育4小时。球体切片的放射自显影片显示这两种单克隆抗体之间存在明显差异。125I - HMFGI放射性抗体仅以与体外免疫染色模式相同的方式定位在球体表面,而125I - AUAI放射性抗体尽管基底外侧所有肿瘤细胞上均均匀存在抗原,但未显示结合。这似乎是由于极化上皮细胞顶端表面连接这些细胞的紧密连接导致基底外侧抗原位点不可及的结果。与HRA - 19细胞系LoVo不同,LoVo球体不形成极性;因此,当用AUAI染色时,在整个细胞表面观察到可变的抗原表达。这些球体的放射自显影片显示125I - AUAI结合并渗透到约1 - 3个细胞的深度,而在体外与该细胞系无反应性的HMFGI未结合。在HRA - 19细胞系的异种移植中进一步研究了这一现象。结果表明,在形成腺泡的肿瘤细胞以极化方式排列的高分化腺癌中,注入的单克隆抗体可能无法接近管腔抗原位点。单克隆抗体在极化和非极化肿瘤上结合的显著差异表明细胞极化和抗原位点的精确位置对体内免疫靶向的重要性。