Suppr超能文献

对于老年胶质母细胞瘤患者,采用低分割放疗与标准分割放疗联合或不联合替莫唑胺的效果比较。

Hypofractionated versus standard radiation therapy with or without temozolomide for older glioblastoma patients.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jun 1;92(2):384-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Older patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma have poor outcomes, and optimal treatment is controversial. Hypofractionated radiation therapy (HRT) is frequently used but has not been compared to patients receiving standard fractionated radiation therapy (SRT) and temozolomide (TMZ).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients ≥65 years of age who received radiation for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma from 1994 to 2013. The distribution of clinical covariates across various radiation regimens was analyzed for possible selection bias. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of hypofractionated radiation (typically, 40 Gy/15 fractions) versus standard fractionation (typically, 60 Gy/30 fractions) in the setting of temozolomide was conducted using Cox regression and propensity score analysis.

RESULTS

Patients received SRT + TMZ (n=57), SRT (n=35), HRT + TMZ (n=34), or HRT (n=9). Patients receiving HRT were significantly older (median: 79 vs 69 years of age; P<.001) and had worse baseline performance status (P<.001) than those receiving SRT. On multivariate analysis, older age (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR]: 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.10, P=.01), lower Karnofsky performance status (AHR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.03; P=.01), multifocal disease (AHR: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.23-3.61, P=.007), and radiation alone (vs SRT + TMZ; SRT: AHR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.06-2.79; P=.03; HRT: AHR: 3.92; 95% CI: 1.44-10.60, P=.007) were associated with decreased overall survival. After propensity score adjustment, patients receiving HRT with TMZ had similar overall survival compared with those receiving SRT with TMZ (AHR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.50-2.4, P=.82).

CONCLUSIONS

With no randomized data demonstrating equivalence between HRT and SRT in the setting of TMZ for glioblastoma, significant selection bias exists in the implementation of HRT. Controlling for this bias, we observed similar overall survival for HRT and SRT with concurrent TMZ among elderly patients, suggesting the need for a randomized trial to compare these regimens directly.

摘要

目的

新诊断为胶质母细胞瘤的老年患者预后较差,其最佳治疗方案存在争议。大分割放疗(HRT)常被应用,但尚未与接受标准分割放疗(SRT)联合替莫唑胺(TMZ)治疗的患者进行比较。

方法和材料

我们对 1994 年至 2013 年间接受放疗治疗新诊断为胶质母细胞瘤的年龄≥65 岁的患者进行了回顾性分析。分析了各种放疗方案中临床协变量的分布情况,以评估可能存在的选择偏倚。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算生存情况。采用 Cox 回归和倾向评分分析比较了替莫唑胺治疗时 HRT(通常为 40 Gy/15 次分割)与 SRT(通常为 60 Gy/30 次分割)的效果。

结果

患者接受 SRT+TMZ(n=57)、SRT(n=35)、HRT+TMZ(n=34)或 HRT(n=9)治疗。与接受 SRT 的患者相比,接受 HRT 的患者年龄明显更大(中位年龄:79 岁 vs 69 岁;P<.001),基线体能状态更差(P<.001)。多变量分析显示,年龄较大(调整后的危险比 [AHR]:1.06;95%置信区间 [CI]:1.01-1.10,P=.01)、卡氏功能状态评分较低(AHR:1.02;95%CI:1.01-1.03;P=.01)、多发病灶(AHR:2.11;95%CI:1.23-3.61;P=.007)和单纯放疗(与 SRT+TMZ 相比;SRT:AHR:1.72;95%CI:1.06-2.79;P=.03;HRT:AHR:3.92;95%CI:1.44-10.60;P=.007)与总生存时间缩短相关。在进行倾向评分调整后,接受 HRT+TMZ 治疗的患者与接受 SRT+TMZ 治疗的患者总生存情况相似(AHR:1.10,95%CI:0.50-2.4,P=.82)。

结论

由于没有随机数据证明 HRT 联合 TMZ 治疗胶质母细胞瘤与 SRT 等效,因此在 HRT 的实施中存在显著的选择偏倚。在控制了这种偏倚后,我们观察到在接受替莫唑胺治疗的老年患者中,HRT 和 SRT 的总生存情况相似,这表明需要进行直接比较这些方案的随机试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验