• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对背痛老年患者,早期和晚期物理治疗师服务的临床结果。

Clinical outcomes of early and later physical therapist services for older adults with back pain.

作者信息

Rundell Sean D, Gellhorn Alfred C, Comstock Bryan A, Heagerty Patrick J, Friedly Janna L, Jarvik Jeffrey G

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA; Comparative Effectiveness, Cost, and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, 4333 Brooklyn Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.

Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2015 Aug 1;15(8):1744-55. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2015.04.001
PMID:25849809
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The timing of physical therapy (PT) services and its association with later function and pain are not clear, especially in older adults.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients receiving early or later PT services with those not receiving PT among older adults presenting to primary care for a new visit for back pain.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective cohort study using the Back Pain Outcomes Using Longitudinal Data registry.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 3,705 adults 65 years and older with a new visit for back pain were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome measures were Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Pain Numerical Rating Scales, and EuroQol-5D.

METHODS

We studied two phases of PT utilization: early (0-28 days) and later (3-6 months). At baseline, we selected the participants with complete 12 months of patient-reported outcomes and electronic medical record data. Early PT was defined as initiating PT less than or equal to 28 days from the index visit for back pain. The no early PT group consisted of patients with no PT, no injections, no surgery, and no chiropractic within 28 days. We restricted the later phase analysis to patients with pain greater than 2 of 10 and an RMDQ score greater than 4 to create a subsample of patients with continuing clinically important back pain. We defined later PT as initiating PT between 3 and 6 months after the index visit. The no later PT group consisted of patients without any PT during this time. We used propensity score matching followed by multiple linear regression to estimate the mean difference in outcome. Sensitivity analysis examined clinically important change and dose of PT use among the early PT group.

RESULTS

The early PT group had better functional status with an adjusted mean RMDQ of 1.1 points less than the no early PT group (95% confidence interval: -2.2, -0.1) and less back pain of -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1) at 12 months. There was no difference between early PT groups at 3 and 6 months. The odds of a 30% improvement in function or pain were not different between these matched groups at 12 months, but the early PT group had increased odds of a 50% improvement in function at 12 months (odds ratio: 1.58, 95% confidence interval: 1.04, 2.40). There was no difference between later groups at 12 months. Greater dose of PT use within the early PT group was associated with better functional status (p= .01).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that among older adults presenting to their primary care providers for a new episode of back pain, early referral to PT resulted in no or minimal differences in pain, function, or health-related quality at 3, 6, or 12 months compared with a matched group that did not receive early PT. Secondary analysis show that patients initiating early PT may be somewhat more likely to experience 50% improvement in function at 12 months.

摘要

背景

物理治疗(PT)服务的时机及其与后期功能和疼痛的关联尚不清楚,尤其是在老年人中。

目的

本研究的目的是比较在初级保健机构因新发背痛就诊的老年人中,接受早期或晚期PT服务的患者与未接受PT服务的患者的临床结局。

研究设计/设置:使用纵向数据的背痛结局登记处进行的前瞻性队列研究。

患者样本

共纳入3705名65岁及以上因新发背痛就诊的成年人。

结局指标

结局指标为罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)、疼痛数字评分量表和欧洲五维健康量表(EuroQol-5D)。

方法

我们研究了PT使用的两个阶段:早期(0-28天)和晚期(3-6个月)。我们选择了具有完整12个月患者报告结局和电子病历数据的参与者。早期PT定义为从背痛指数就诊起28天内开始接受PT。未早期接受PT组包括在28天内未接受PT、未注射、未手术且未接受整脊治疗的患者。我们将后期分析限制在疼痛评分大于10分中的2分且RMDQ评分大于4分的患者,以创建具有持续临床重要性背痛的患者子样本。我们将晚期PT定义为在指数就诊后3至6个月开始接受PT。未晚期接受PT组包括在此期间未接受任何PT的患者。我们使用倾向得分匹配,然后进行多元线性回归来估计结局的平均差异。敏感性分析检查了早期PT组中具有临床重要意义的变化和PT使用剂量。

结果

早期PT组在12个月时功能状态更好,调整后的平均RMDQ比未早期接受PT组低1.1分(95%置信区间:-2.2,-0.1),背痛减轻0.5分(-0.9,-0.1)。在3个月和6个月时,早期PT组之间没有差异。在这些匹配组中,12个月时功能或疼痛改善30%的几率没有差异,但早期PT组在12个月时功能改善50%的几率增加(优势比:1.58,95%置信区间:1.04,2.40)。12个月时晚期组之间没有差异。早期PT组中更大剂量的PT使用与更好的功能状态相关(p = 0.01)。

结论

我们发现,在因新发背痛就诊于初级保健提供者的老年人中,与未早期接受PT的匹配组相比,早期转诊至PT在3、6或12个月时疼痛、功能或健康相关生活质量方面没有差异或差异最小。二次分析表明,早期开始接受PT的患者在12个月时功能改善50%的可能性可能略高。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes of early and later physical therapist services for older adults with back pain.针对背痛老年患者,早期和晚期物理治疗师服务的临床结果。
Spine J. 2015 Aug 1;15(8):1744-55. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
2
Subsequent health-care utilization associated with early physical therapy for new episodes of low back pain in older adults.老年人新发腰痛早期进行物理治疗与后续医疗保健利用的关系。
Spine J. 2017 Mar;17(3):380-389. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
3
The access randomized clinical trial of public versus private physiotherapy for low back pain.公共与私人物理治疗低腰痛的随机临床试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jan 15;37(2):85-96. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182127457.
4
Association of early imaging for back pain with clinical outcomes in older adults.腰痛早期影像学检查与老年患者临床结局的相关性。
JAMA. 2015 Mar 17;313(11):1143-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1871.
5
Effect of Comorbid Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis on Longitudinal Clinical and Health Care Use Outcomes in Older Adults With New Visits for Back Pain.合并存在的膝关节和髋关节骨关节炎对因新发背痛就诊的老年人纵向临床及医疗保健使用结果的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jan;98(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
6
Patient-reported outcomes associated with use of physical therapist services by older adults with a new visit for back pain.有新发背痛前来就诊的老年人使用物理治疗师服务所关联的患者报告结局。
Phys Ther. 2015 Feb;95(2):190-201. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140132. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
7
Relationship of Opioid Prescriptions to Physical Therapy Referral and Participation for Medicaid Patients with New-Onset Low Back Pain.阿片类药物处方与医疗补助计划中新发腰痛患者的物理治疗转诊及参与情况的关系
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Nov-Dec;30(6):784-794. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170064.
8
Mapping a patient-reported functional outcome measure to a utility measure for comparative effectiveness and economic evaluations in older adults with low back pain.将患者报告的功能结局测量指标映射为效用测量指标,用于老年腰痛患者的比较疗效和经济学评价。
Med Decis Making. 2014 Oct;34(7):873-83. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14533995. Epub 2014 May 14.
9
The use of STarT back screening tool to predict functional disability outcomes in patients receiving physical therapy for low back pain.使用 STarT 后背筛查工具预测接受物理治疗的腰痛患者的功能障碍结局。
Spine J. 2019 Apr;19(4):645-654. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
10
Long-term outcomes of a large, prospective observational cohort of older adults with back pain.老年腰痛患者大型前瞻性观察队列的长期结果。
Spine J. 2018 Sep;18(9):1540-1551. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilization and Potential Disparities in Access to Physical Therapy for Spine Pain in the Long-Term Care Population.长期护理人群中脊柱疼痛物理治疗的使用情况及潜在差异
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Nov;105(11):2089-2096. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.032. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
2
The Effects of Early Physiotherapy Treatment on Musculoskeletal Injury Outcomes in Military Personnel: A Narrative Review.早期物理治疗对军事人员肌肉骨骼损伤结局的影响:叙事性综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 17;19(20):13416. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013416.
3
Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with a Musculoskeletal Disorder.
因肌肉骨骼疾病到急诊科就诊患者的健康相关生活质量
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Feb 19;14:91-103. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S348138. eCollection 2022.
4
Time Between an Emergency Department Visit and Initiation of Physical Therapist Intervention: Health Care Utilization and Costs.急诊科就诊与物理治疗师干预开始之间的时间:医疗保健利用和成本。
Phys Ther. 2020 Sep 28;100(10):1782-1792. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa100.
5
Effectiveness of physical therapy treatment in addition to usual podiatry management of plantar heel pain: a randomized clinical trial.物理治疗联合常规足病管理治疗足底足跟疼痛的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Dec 28;20(1):630. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-3009-y.
6
Value-Based Care for Musculoskeletal Pain: Are Physical Therapists Ready to Deliver?基于价值的肌肉骨骼疼痛护理:物理治疗师是否已准备好提供服务?
Phys Ther. 2020 Apr 17;100(4):621-632. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz171.
7
Effectiveness of the Pilates method versus aerobic exercises in the treatment of older adults with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial protocol.普拉提方法与有氧运动治疗老年慢性腰痛的效果比较:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 May 24;20(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2642-9.
8
Using Pain Medication Intensity to Stratify Back Pain Among Older Adults.利用疼痛药物强度对老年人群的背痛进行分层。
Pain Med. 2019 Feb 1;20(2):252-266. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny007.
9
Health Services Research in Rehabilitation and Disability-The Time is Now.康复与残疾领域的卫生服务研究——当下正当时。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jan;99(1):198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.026. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
10
Associations Between Relative Value Units and Patient-Reported Back Pain and Disability.相对价值单位与患者报告的背痛及残疾之间的关联。
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2017 Jan 16;3:2333721416686019. doi: 10.1177/2333721416686019. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.