Hoppstädter Jessica, Seif Michelle, Dembek Anna, Cavelius Christian, Huwer Hanno, Kraegeloh Annette, Kiemer Alexandra K
Department of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology, Saarland University, Saarbruecken Germany.
Korea Institute of Science and Technology Europe, Saarbruecken Germany.
Front Pharmacol. 2015 Mar 23;6:55. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00055. eCollection 2015.
While silica nanoparticles have enabled numerous industrial and medical applications, their toxicological safety requires further evaluation. Macrophages are the major cell population responsible for nanoparticle clearance in vivo. The prevailing macrophage phenotype largely depends on the local immune status of the host. Whereas M1-polarized macrophages are considered as pro-inflammatory macrophages involved in host defense, M2 macrophages exhibit anti-inflammatory and wound-healing properties, but also promote tumor growth. We employed different models of M1 and M2 polarization: granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/lipopolysaccharide (LPS)/interferon (IFN)-γ was used to generate primary human M1 cells and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF)/interleukin (IL)-10 to differentiate M2 monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM). PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells were polarized towards an M1 type by LPS/IFN-γ and towards M2 by IL-10. Uptake of fluorescent silica nanoparticles (Ø26 and 41 nm) and microparticles (Ø1.75 μm) was quantified. At the concentration used (50 μg/ml), silica nanoparticles did not influence cell viability as assessed by MTT assay. Nanoparticle uptake was enhanced in M2-polarized primary human MDM compared with M1 cells, as shown by flow cytometric and microscopic approaches. In contrast, the uptake of microparticles did not differ between M1 and M2 phenotypes. M2 polarization was also associated with increased nanoparticle uptake in the macrophage-like THP-1 cell line. In accordance, in vivo polarized M2-like primary human tumor-associated macrophages obtained from lung tumors took up more nanoparticles than M1-like alveolar macrophages isolated from the surrounding lung tissue. In summary, our data indicate that the M2 polarization of macrophages promotes nanoparticle internalization. Therefore, the phenotypical differences between macrophage subsets should be taken into consideration in future investigations on nanosafety, but might also open up therapeutic perspectives allowing to specifically target M2 polarized macrophages.
虽然二氧化硅纳米颗粒已在众多工业和医学应用中得到应用,但其毒理学安全性仍需进一步评估。巨噬细胞是体内负责纳米颗粒清除的主要细胞群体。主要的巨噬细胞表型很大程度上取决于宿主的局部免疫状态。M1极化的巨噬细胞被认为是参与宿主防御的促炎巨噬细胞,而M2巨噬细胞具有抗炎和伤口愈合特性,但也促进肿瘤生长。我们采用了不同的M1和M2极化模型:粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子/脂多糖(LPS)/干扰素(IFN)-γ用于生成原代人M1细胞,巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(M-CSF)/白细胞介素(IL)-10用于分化M2单核细胞衍生的巨噬细胞(MDM)。经佛波酯(PMA)分化的THP-1细胞通过LPS/IFN-γ向M1型极化,通过IL-10向M2型极化。对荧光二氧化硅纳米颗粒(直径26和41 nm)和微粒(直径1.75μm)的摄取进行了定量。在所使用的浓度(50μg/ml)下,通过MTT法评估,二氧化硅纳米颗粒不影响细胞活力。如流式细胞术和显微镜方法所示,与M1细胞相比,M2极化的原代人MDM中纳米颗粒的摄取增加。相反,M1和M2表型之间微粒的摄取没有差异。M2极化也与巨噬细胞样THP-1细胞系中纳米颗粒摄取的增加有关。相应地,从肺肿瘤中获得的体内极化的M2样原代人肿瘤相关巨噬细胞比从周围肺组织分离的M1样肺泡巨噬细胞摄取更多的纳米颗粒。总之,我们的数据表明巨噬细胞的M2极化促进纳米颗粒内化。因此,在未来的纳米安全性研究中应考虑巨噬细胞亚群之间的表型差异,但这也可能开辟治疗前景,允许特异性靶向M2极化的巨噬细胞。