Higley K, Ruedig E, Gomez-Fernandez M, Caffrey E, Jia J, Comolli M, Hess C
Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics, Oregon State University, 100 Radiation Centre, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA
Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, USA.
Ann ICRP. 2015 Jun;44(1 Suppl):313-30. doi: 10.1177/0146645315576097. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
Over the past decade, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has developed a comprehensive approach to environmental protection that includes the use of Reference Animals and Plants (RAPs) to assess radiological impacts on the environment. For the purposes of calculating radiation dose, the RAPs are approximated as simple shapes that contain homogeneous distributions of radionuclides. As uncertainties in environmental dose effects are larger than uncertainties in radiation dose calculation, some have argued against more realistic dose calculation methodologies. However, due to the complexity of organism morphology, internal structure, and density, dose rates calculated via a homogenous model may be too simplistic. The purpose of this study is to examine the benefits of a voxelised phantom compared with simple shapes for organism modelling. Both methods typically use Monte Carlo methods to calculate absorbed dose, but voxelised modelling uses an exact three-dimensional replica of an organism with accurate tissue composition and radionuclide source distribution. It is a multi-stage procedure that couples imaging modalities and processing software with Monte Carlo N-Particle. These features increase dosimetric accuracy, and may reduce uncertainty in non-human biota dose-effect studies by providing mechanistic answers regarding where and how population-level dose effects arise.