• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑死亡与多器官移植中的伦理问题。

Ethical issues in brain death and multiorgan transplantation.

作者信息

Bernat J L

机构信息

Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire.

出版信息

Neurol Clin. 1989 Nov;7(4):715-28.

PMID:2586396
Abstract

There is a consensus in Western society that "brain death" is the medical and legal standard for human death. Patients in persistent vegetative states may have lost their "personhood," but they are not dead. It may be desirable to maintain the physiologic processes of a brain-dead pregnant woman to permit the birth of her child. The determination of brain death and plans for multiorgan transplantation should be conducted independently. It is axiomatic that the multiorgan transplantation donor must be dead. Therefore, living anencephalic infants and patients in persistent vegetative states cannot be organ donors. It is permissable to temporarily maintain the physiologic processes of brain-dead patients in order procure their organs for transplantation. Society will have to decide if money spent on multiorgan procurement and transplantation is better spent in other areas of health care.

摘要

西方社会存在一种共识,即“脑死亡”是判定人类死亡的医学和法律标准。处于持续性植物状态的患者可能已丧失其“人格”,但他们并未死亡。维持脑死亡孕妇的生理过程以使其胎儿能够出生或许是可取的。脑死亡的判定以及多器官移植计划应独立进行。多器官移植供体必须已死亡,这是不言而喻的。因此,无脑儿活体婴儿和处于持续性植物状态的患者不能作为器官供体。为了获取脑死亡患者的器官用于移植,暂时维持其生理过程是可行的。社会将不得不决定,花在多器官获取和移植上的资金是否更适合用于医疗保健的其他领域。

相似文献

1
Ethical issues in brain death and multiorgan transplantation.脑死亡与多器官移植中的伦理问题。
Neurol Clin. 1989 Nov;7(4):715-28.
2
Ethical issues in the use of anencephalic infants as organ donors.
Neurol Clin. 1989 Nov;7(4):729-43.
3
Organs from anencephalic infants: an idea whose time has not yet come.无脑儿的器官:一个时机尚未成熟的想法。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1988 Oct-Nov;18(5):5-10.
4
Anencephalic infants as organ donors.无脑儿作为器官捐献者。
Pediatrics. 1988 Aug;82(2):250-6.
5
Role of brain death and the dead-donor rule in the ethics of organ transplantation.脑死亡和死亡供体规则在器官移植伦理中的作用。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Sep;31(9):2391-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000090869.19410.3C.
6
Organ prolongation in anencephalic infants: ethical & medical issues.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1988 Oct-Nov;18(5):19-27.
7
Experience with anencephalic infants as prospective organ donors.将无脑儿作为潜在器官捐献者的经验。
N Engl J Med. 1989 Aug 10;321(6):344-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198908103210602.
8
Critical issues debates: intervention for infants with fatal heart disease, xenografting, and brain death criteria for anencephalic infants. Debate III. Resolved: brain death criteria must be revised so that society can readily benefit from families who offer their anencephalic infants as organ donors.关键问题辩论:对患有致命心脏病的婴儿的干预、异种移植以及无脑儿的脑死亡标准。辩论三。决议:必须修订脑死亡标准,以便社会能够从那些将无脑儿作为器官捐献者的家庭中轻易受益。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993 Nov-Dec;12(6 pt.2):S369-78.
9
[Brain death from the viewpoint of transplantation surgery].[从移植外科角度看脑死亡]
Diskussionsforum Med Ethik. 1990 Oct(4):2 p. following 502.
10
Removing organs from anencephalic infants: ethical and legal considerations.
Clin Perinatol. 1989 Jun;16(2):331-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Are Brain Dead Individuals Dead? Grounds for Reasonable Doubt.脑死亡个体算是死亡吗?存在合理怀疑的理由。
J Med Philos. 2016 Jun;41(3):329-50. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhw003. Epub 2016 Apr 13.