Suppr超能文献

氮校正真代谢能估计值的标准误差:粪便样本合并及忽略对照禽鸟个体差异的影响

Standard errors of nitrogen-corrected true metabolizable energy estimates: effects of pooling excreta samples and ignoring among-control bird variation.

作者信息

Wolynetz M S, Sibbald I R

机构信息

Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 1989 Oct;68(10):1361-7. doi: 10.3382/ps.0681361.

Abstract

To estimate TME(n), it appears to be advantageous to pool excreta samples prior to analysis for energy and nitrogen; accurate (nonbiased) estimates should result. With this protocol, estimates of precision are based entirely on the among-bird variance in excreta weight of the fed birds. However, because of the inconsistent relationship between excreta weight and excreta energy, the SE resulting from this pooling protocol generally are unrelated to the correct values obtained when the energy and nitrogen concentrations are measured in the excreta of each bird. Failure to account for the among-control-bird variation in excreta energy overstates the precision (i.e. underestimates the SE) of TME(n) estimates.

摘要

为了估算真代谢能(TME(n)),在分析能量和氮之前将排泄物样本合并似乎是有利的;应该能得到准确(无偏差)的估计值。采用这种方案,精度估计完全基于采食鸟类排泄物重量的个体间差异。然而,由于排泄物重量与排泄物能量之间的关系不一致,这种合并方案得出的标准误通常与分别测量每只鸟排泄物中的能量和氮浓度时获得的正确值无关。未考虑对照鸟类排泄物能量的个体间差异会高估TME(n)估计值的精度(即低估标准误)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验