Shaya Fadia T, Breunig Ian M, Mehra Mandeep R
Heart and Vascular Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail:
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Jan;21(1):39-47.
To examine comorbidity and therapy use rates in a Medicaid population with heart failure (HF), evaluate hospitalization risk as a function of comorbidity and therapy use, and assess the impact of modification on costs to the Medicaid program.
Historical prospective cohort study. Claims were from adult enrollees in Maryland Medicaid (managed care organization or fee-for-service) diagnosed with HF between 2005 and 2009.
The end point was first hospitalization after index HF. Average hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated by multivariate weighted Cox regression. Budget impact of modifications was assessed using annual number-needed-to-treat calculations and external estimate of average cost of HF hospitalization.
Most patients were >45 years (71%), women (56%), and black (60%). Medication use: beta-blockers (26%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and/or angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ACEi/ARBs) (29%), aldosterone antagonists (5%), and others including nitrates-hydralazine (37%). Nearly all (98%) were diagnosed with 1 or more comorbidities. Relative risk of hospitalization was higher with most, but not all, comorbidities investigated. ACEi/ARBs (HR, 0.77; CI, 0.73-0.81), beta-blockers (HR, 0.83; CI, 0.79-0.87), and other cardiovascular drugs (HR, 0.76; CI, 0.72-0.80) had beneficial effects. A 20% increase in the use prevalence of ACEi/ARBs and beta-blockers translated to annual Medicaid savings of at least $85 and $57 per HF patient, respectively.
Findings call attention to comorbidities and optimization of disease-modifying therapy in Medicaid patients with HF. Certain disease-modifying medications mitigated risk, but were used infrequently. Substantive outcome improvement and savings to Medicaid may be achieved with small changes in prescribing rates or comorbidity prevalence.
研究医疗补助计划覆盖的心力衰竭(HF)患者的共病情况及治疗使用率,评估共病和治疗使用情况对住院风险的影响,并评估改善措施对医疗补助计划成本的影响。
回顾性前瞻性队列研究。数据来自2005年至2009年期间马里兰州医疗补助计划(管理式医疗组织或按服务收费)中被诊断为HF的成年参保者。
终点为首次HF发作后的首次住院。通过多变量加权Cox回归估计平均风险比(HR)。使用每年需治疗人数计算和HF住院平均成本的外部估计值评估改善措施的预算影响。
大多数患者年龄>45岁(71%),女性(56%),黑人(60%)。药物使用情况:β受体阻滞剂(26%),血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和/或血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂(ACEi/ARBs)(29%),醛固酮拮抗剂(5%),以及其他包括硝酸盐-肼屈嗪(37%)。几乎所有患者(98%)被诊断患有一种或多种共病。在所研究的大多数但并非所有共病中,住院的相对风险较高。ACEi/ARBs(HR,0.77;CI,0.73 - 0.81)、β受体阻滞剂(HR,0.83;CI,0.79 - 0.87)和其他心血管药物(HR,0.76;CI,0.72 - 0.80)具有有益作用。ACEi/ARBs和β受体阻滞剂使用患病率增加20%分别转化为每位HF患者每年至少节省医疗补助费用85美元和57美元。
研究结果提醒人们关注医疗补助计划中HF患者的共病情况以及改善病情治疗的优化。某些改善病情的药物可降低风险,但使用频率较低。通过小幅改变处方率或共病患病率,可能会实现医疗补助计划显著的结果改善和成本节省。