Morris Christopher, Bebeau Nicolas P, Brockhoff Hans, Tandon Rahul, Tiwana Paul
Private Practice, Colleyville, TX; Clinical Faculty, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, John Peter Smith Hospital, Fort Worth, TX.
Former Resident, Scottsdale, AZ.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 May;73(5):951.e1-951.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
The objective of this study was to complete a comprehensive retrospective review of the epidemiology and patterns of injury in mandibular trauma based on the Parkland Memorial Hospital trauma database over a 17-year period. The authors identified 4,143 fractures in 2,828 patients from the databank. In mandibular trauma, the mechanism of injury and several other variables can be an important point of differentiation with regard to fracture pattern. By showing the statistical relation between these and fracture pattern, the authors hope to provide surgeons with a better understanding of such a relation.
Mandibular fracture data were collected from the Parkland Memorial Hospital trauma registry using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes (802.21 to 802.39). Information included fracture type, age, gender, mechanism of injury, and associated injuries. The Parkland Memorial Hospital trauma registry yielded 4,143 mandibular fractures in 2,828 patients managed at Parkland Memorial Hospital from 1993 through 2010.
Based on retrospective analysis, results were obtained for age, gender, monthly distribution, anatomic distribution, and mechanism of injury. The average age was approximately 38 years, with most patients (33%) in the third decade. An overwhelming majority of patients were men (83.27%), with only 16.27% consisting of women. Most injuries occurred in the summer months, with July being the most common month of occurrence. The mechanism of injury predominantly involved low-velocity blunt injuries (62%) compared with high-velocity blunt injuries (31%). The anatomic distribution of fractures evaluated was the angle (27%), symphysis (21.3%), condyle and subcondyle (18.4%), and body (16.8%).
This study helps provide and support the relation between several variables associated with many common traumatic injuries seen in the mandible. This analysis can be used to help surgeons identify and anticipate injuries based on age, gender, and mechanism of injury.
本研究的目的是基于帕克兰纪念医院17年的创伤数据库,对下颌骨创伤的流行病学和损伤模式进行全面的回顾性分析。作者从数据库中识别出2828例患者的4143处骨折。在下颌骨创伤中,损伤机制和其他几个变量可能是骨折类型的重要区分点。通过展示这些因素与骨折类型之间的统计关系,作者希望能让外科医生更好地理解这种关系。
使用国际疾病分类第九版编码(802.21至802.39)从帕克兰纪念医院创伤登记处收集下颌骨骨折数据。信息包括骨折类型、年龄、性别、损伤机制和相关损伤。帕克兰纪念医院创伤登记处提供了1993年至2010年在该医院接受治疗的2828例患者的4143处下颌骨骨折情况。
通过回顾性分析,得出了年龄、性别、月度分布、解剖分布和损伤机制的结果。平均年龄约为38岁,大多数患者(33%)处于第三个十年。绝大多数患者为男性(83.27%),女性仅占16.27%。大多数损伤发生在夏季,7月是最常见的发生月份。损伤机制主要涉及低速钝性损伤(62%),而高速钝性损伤占31%。评估的骨折解剖分布为角部(27%)、颏部(21.3%)、髁突和髁突下(18.4%)以及体部(16.8%)。
本研究有助于提供并支持下颌骨常见创伤性损伤相关的几个变量之间的关系。该分析可用于帮助外科医生根据年龄、性别和损伤机制识别和预测损伤情况。