Suppr超能文献

对接受过一种或多种先前化疗治疗后难治的转移性或复发性软组织肉瘤患者的药物治疗模式和临床结果进行回顾性图表审查。

A retrospective chart review of drug treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic or recurrent soft tissue sarcoma refractory to one or more prior chemotherapy treatments.

作者信息

Wagner Michael J, Amodu Leo Ismaila, Duh Mei Sheng, Korves Caroline, Solleza Franco, Manson Stephanie C, Diaz José, Neary Maureen P, Demetri George D

机构信息

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Ludwig Center at Harvard, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.

MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2015 Mar 25;15:175. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1182-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited clinical data on real-world practice patterns are available for patients with metastatic/relapsed soft tissue sarcomas (STS). The primary objective of this study was to evaluate treatment patterns in patients with metastatic/relapsed STS following failure of prior chemotherapy by examining data collected from 2000 to 2011 from a major tertiary academic cancer center in the United States.

METHODS

Medical records, including community-based referral records, from a tertiary cancer center for adult patients with metastatic/relapsed STS with confirmed disease progression who commenced second-line treatment between January 1, 2000 and February 4, 2011, and with at least 3 months of follow-up data following second-line treatment initiation, were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival, time to progression, and clinician-reported tumor response were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 99 patients (leiomyosarcoma, n = 48; synovial cell sarcoma, n = 7; liposarcoma, n = 5; or other histological subtypes, n = 39) received an average of four lines of treatment (maximum of 10). No consistent or dominant regimens were used in each treatment line beyond the second line. Median second-line treatment duration was 4.1 months (95% confidence interval, 3.0-5.0). Overall, 72 of 99 patients (73%) discontinued second-line treatment due to progressive disease. Median progression-free survival from initiation of second-line treatment varied across regimens from 2.0 to 6.6 months (overall median, 5.4 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Wide variations in treatment were evident, with no single standard of care for patients with metastatic/relapsed STS. Most patients discontinued second-line treatment due to progressive disease, often receiving additional systemic therapy with other drugs. These data suggest a high unmet need for more efficacious treatment options and improved data collection to guide practice among patients with relapsed/refractory STS.

摘要

背景

关于转移性/复发性软组织肉瘤(STS)患者的真实世界实践模式的临床数据有限。本研究的主要目的是通过检查2000年至2011年从美国一家大型三级学术癌症中心收集的数据,评估先前化疗失败后转移性/复发性STS患者的治疗模式。

方法

回顾性审查了一家三级癌症中心的成年转移性/复发性STS患者的病历,包括社区转诊记录,这些患者确诊疾病进展,于2000年1月1日至2011年2月4日开始二线治疗,且二线治疗开始后至少有3个月的随访数据。收集了总生存期、疾病进展时间和临床医生报告的肿瘤反应。

结果

共有99例患者(平滑肌肉瘤,n = 48;滑膜细胞肉瘤,n = 7;脂肪肉瘤,n = 5;或其他组织学亚型,n = 39)平均接受了四线治疗(最多10线)。二线以后的各治疗线中未使用一致或占主导地位的方案。二线治疗的中位持续时间为4.1个月(95%置信区间,3.0 - 5.0)。总体而言,99例患者中有72例(73%)因疾病进展而停止二线治疗。二线治疗开始后的无进展生存期的中位数因方案而异,为2.0至6.6个月(总体中位数为5.4个月)。

结论

治疗差异明显,转移性/复发性STS患者没有单一的标准治疗方案。大多数患者因疾病进展而停止二线治疗,通常接受其他药物的额外全身治疗。这些数据表明,对于复发/难治性STS患者,非常需要更有效的治疗选择和改进数据收集以指导实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7d1/4397886/d54ba2f7459c/12885_2015_1182_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验