Wagner Michael J, Amodu Leo Ismaila, Duh Mei Sheng, Korves Caroline, Solleza Franco, Manson Stephanie C, Diaz José, Neary Maureen P, Demetri George D
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Ludwig Center at Harvard, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
BMC Cancer. 2015 Mar 25;15:175. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1182-4.
Limited clinical data on real-world practice patterns are available for patients with metastatic/relapsed soft tissue sarcomas (STS). The primary objective of this study was to evaluate treatment patterns in patients with metastatic/relapsed STS following failure of prior chemotherapy by examining data collected from 2000 to 2011 from a major tertiary academic cancer center in the United States.
Medical records, including community-based referral records, from a tertiary cancer center for adult patients with metastatic/relapsed STS with confirmed disease progression who commenced second-line treatment between January 1, 2000 and February 4, 2011, and with at least 3 months of follow-up data following second-line treatment initiation, were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival, time to progression, and clinician-reported tumor response were collected.
A total of 99 patients (leiomyosarcoma, n = 48; synovial cell sarcoma, n = 7; liposarcoma, n = 5; or other histological subtypes, n = 39) received an average of four lines of treatment (maximum of 10). No consistent or dominant regimens were used in each treatment line beyond the second line. Median second-line treatment duration was 4.1 months (95% confidence interval, 3.0-5.0). Overall, 72 of 99 patients (73%) discontinued second-line treatment due to progressive disease. Median progression-free survival from initiation of second-line treatment varied across regimens from 2.0 to 6.6 months (overall median, 5.4 months).
Wide variations in treatment were evident, with no single standard of care for patients with metastatic/relapsed STS. Most patients discontinued second-line treatment due to progressive disease, often receiving additional systemic therapy with other drugs. These data suggest a high unmet need for more efficacious treatment options and improved data collection to guide practice among patients with relapsed/refractory STS.
关于转移性/复发性软组织肉瘤(STS)患者的真实世界实践模式的临床数据有限。本研究的主要目的是通过检查2000年至2011年从美国一家大型三级学术癌症中心收集的数据,评估先前化疗失败后转移性/复发性STS患者的治疗模式。
回顾性审查了一家三级癌症中心的成年转移性/复发性STS患者的病历,包括社区转诊记录,这些患者确诊疾病进展,于2000年1月1日至2011年2月4日开始二线治疗,且二线治疗开始后至少有3个月的随访数据。收集了总生存期、疾病进展时间和临床医生报告的肿瘤反应。
共有99例患者(平滑肌肉瘤,n = 48;滑膜细胞肉瘤,n = 7;脂肪肉瘤,n = 5;或其他组织学亚型,n = 39)平均接受了四线治疗(最多10线)。二线以后的各治疗线中未使用一致或占主导地位的方案。二线治疗的中位持续时间为4.1个月(95%置信区间,3.0 - 5.0)。总体而言,99例患者中有72例(73%)因疾病进展而停止二线治疗。二线治疗开始后的无进展生存期的中位数因方案而异,为2.0至6.6个月(总体中位数为5.4个月)。
治疗差异明显,转移性/复发性STS患者没有单一的标准治疗方案。大多数患者因疾病进展而停止二线治疗,通常接受其他药物的额外全身治疗。这些数据表明,对于复发/难治性STS患者,非常需要更有效的治疗选择和改进数据收集以指导实践。