Watson Alison, Charlesworth Lisa, Jacob Ruth, Kendrick Denise, Logan Philippa, Marshall Fiona, Montgomery Alan, Sach Tracey, Tan Wei, Walker Maria, Waring Justin, Whitham Diane, Sahota Opinder
Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England.
Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit|, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England.
Trials. 2015 Feb 8;16:41. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0551-2.
Older people represent a significant proportion of patients admitted to hospital. Their care compared to younger patients is more challenging, length of stay is longer, risk of hospital-acquired problems higher and the risk of being re-admitted within 28 days greater. This study aims to compare a Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) service with Traditional Hospital Based rehabilitation (THB-Rehab) provided to the older person. The CIRACT service differs from the THB-rehab service in that they are able to provide more intensive hospital rehabilitation, visiting patients daily, and are able to continue with the patient's rehabilitation following discharge allowing a seamless, integrated discharge working alongside community providers. A pilot comparing the two services showed that the CIRACT service demonstrated reduced length of stay and reduced re-admission rates when analysed over a four-month period.
METHODS/DESIGN: This trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the CIRACT service, conducted as a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with an integral qualitative mechanism and action study designed to provide the explanatory and theoretical components on how the CIRACT service compares to current practice. The RCT element consists of 240 patients over 70 years of age, being randomised to either the THB therapy group or the CIRACT service following an unplanned hospital admission. The primary outcome will be hospital length of stay from admission to discharge from the general medical elderly care ward. Additional outcome measures including the Barthel Index, Charlson Co-morbidity Scale, EuroQoL-5D and the modified Client Service Receipt Inventory will be assessed at the time of recruitment and repeated at 91 days post-discharge. The qualitative mechanism and action study will involve a systematic programme of organisational profiling, observations of work processes, interviews with key informants and care providers and tracking of participants. In addition, a within-trial economic evaluation will be undertaken comparing the CIRACT and THB-rehab services to determine cost-effectiveness.
The outcome of the study will inform clinical decision-making, with respect to allocation of resources linked to hospital discharge planning and re-admissions, in a resource intensive and growing group of patients.
Registered with the ISRCTN registry ( ISCRCTN94393315 ) on 25 April 2013 (version 3.1, 11 September 2014).
老年人占住院患者的很大比例。与年轻患者相比,对他们的护理更具挑战性,住院时间更长,医院获得性问题的风险更高,且28天内再次入院的风险更大。本研究旨在比较为老年人提供的社区延伸与护理过渡(CIRACT)服务和传统的基于医院的康复(THB - Rehab)服务。CIRACT服务与THB - 康复服务的不同之处在于,它能够提供更强化的医院康复,每天探访患者,并能够在患者出院后继续进行康复治疗,从而实现无缝、综合的出院,并与社区服务提供者协同工作。一项比较这两种服务的试点研究表明,在四个月的分析期内,CIRACT服务的住院时间缩短,再入院率降低。
方法/设计:本试验将评估CIRACT服务的临床和成本效益,作为一项随机对照试验(RCT)进行,该试验具有完整的定性机制和行动研究,旨在提供关于CIRACT服务与当前实践相比的解释性和理论性组成部分。RCT部分包括240名70岁以上的患者,在非计划住院后被随机分配到THB治疗组或CIRACT服务组。主要结局将是从入住综合内科老年护理病房到出院的住院时间。其他结局指标,包括巴氏指数、查尔森合并症量表、欧洲五维度健康量表(EuroQoL - 5D)和改良的客户服务收据清单,将在招募时进行评估,并在出院后91天重复评估。定性机制和行动研究将包括一个系统的组织概况分析计划、工作流程观察、与关键信息提供者和护理人员的访谈以及对参与者的跟踪。此外,将进行试验内经济评估,比较CIRACT和THB - 康复服务以确定成本效益。
研究结果将为临床决策提供信息,涉及与医院出院计划和再入院相关的资源分配,这一决策针对的是资源密集且不断增长患者群体。
于2013年4月25日在国际标准随机对照试验编号注册库(ISRCTN registry,ISCRCTN94393315)注册(2014年9月收集版本3.1)。