Hokimoto Seiji, Akasaka Tomonori, Tabata Noriaki, Arima Yuichiro, Tsujita Kenichi, Sakamoto Kenji, Kaikita Koichi, Morita Kazunori, Kumagae Naoki, Yamamoto Eiichiro, Oniki Kentaro, Nakagawa Kazuko, Ogawa Hisao
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Thromb Res. 2015 Jun;135(6):1081-6. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.03.033. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism and co-therapy with esomeprazole on the antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel.
The antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel depends on CYP2C19 polymorphism or the co-administration of some kind of proton pump inhibitor (PPI).
CYP2C19 genotype and the residual platelet reactivity (RPR) were measured in 361 coronary heart disease patients (male, mean age 69yrs), and the risk of cardiovascular events over a 3-month follow-up was assessed to evaluate the impact of co-administration of esomeprazole during dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel.
The values of RPR did not differ between esomeprazole and non-esomeprazole groups (4389 ± 1112 versus 4079 ± 1355 AU·min, P=0.103). RPR value was higher in intermediate metabolizers (IM) than in extensive metabolizers (EM) (4089 ± 1252 versus 3697 ± 1215 AU·min P=0.012) and, similarly, higher in poor metabolizers (PM) than in IM (4884 ± 1027 versus 4089 ± 1252 AU·min, P<0.001). There were no differences in RPR between esomeprazole and non-esomeprazole groups according to CYP2C19 genotype (EM, 3954 ± 1192 versus 3645 ± 1220 AU·min, P=0.361; IM, 4401 ± 1063 versus 4051 ± 1271 AU·min, P=0.293; PM, 4917 ± 669 versus 4876 ± 1099 AU·min, P=0.907, respectively). There was also no difference in clinical outcomes between esomeprazole and non-esomeprazole groups in the three-month follow-up (0% versus 0.92%, P=0.487).
These results suggest that concomitant use of esomeprazole with clopidogrel is not associated with reduced antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel or increased risk of cardiovascular events, irrespective of CYP2C19 genotype.
本研究旨在探讨CYP2C19基因多态性及与埃索美拉唑联合治疗对氯吡格雷抗血小板疗效的影响。
氯吡格雷的抗血小板疗效取决于CYP2C19基因多态性或某种质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的联合使用。
对361例冠心病患者(男性,平均年龄69岁)测定CYP2C19基因型和残余血小板反应性(RPR),并评估3个月随访期间心血管事件风险,以评价在阿司匹林和氯吡格雷双重抗血小板治疗期间联合使用埃索美拉唑的影响。
埃索美拉唑组和非埃索美拉唑组的RPR值无差异(4389±1112对4079±1355 AU·min,P = 0.103)。中间代谢型(IM)患者的RPR值高于广泛代谢型(EM)患者(4089±1252对3697±1215 AU·min,P = 0.012),同样,慢代谢型(PM)患者的RPR值高于IM患者(4884±1027对4089±1252 AU·min,P<0.001)。根据CYP2C19基因型,埃索美拉唑组和非埃索美拉唑组的RPR无差异(EM,3954±1192对3645±1220 AU·min,P = 0.361;IM,4401±1063对4051±1271 AU·min,P = 0.293;PM,4917±669对4876±1099 AU·min,P = 0.907)。在三个月的随访中,埃索美拉唑组和非埃索美拉唑组的临床结局也无差异(0%对0.92%,P = 0.487)。
这些结果表明,无论CYP2C19基因型如何,埃索美拉唑与氯吡格雷联合使用与氯吡格雷抗血小板疗效降低或心血管事件风险增加无关。