Suppr超能文献

溶酶体贮积症药物研发的压力——美国孤儿药法案颁布三十年后的定量分析

Pressure for drug development in lysosomal storage disorders - a quantitative analysis thirty years beyond the US orphan drug act.

作者信息

Mechler Konstantin, Mountford William K, Hoffmann Georg F, Ries Markus

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Pediatric Psychopharmacology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.

Clinical Research Program, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA.

出版信息

Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015 Apr 18;10:46. doi: 10.1186/s13023-015-0262-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lysosomal storage disorders are a heterogeneous group of approximately 50 monogenically inherited orphan conditions. A defect leads to the storage of complex molecules in the lysosome, and patients develop a complex multisystemic phenotype of high morbidity often associated with premature death. More than 30 years ago the Orphan Drug Act of 1983 passed the United States legislation intended to facilitate the development of drugs for rare disorders. We directed our efforts in assessing which lysosomal diseases had drug development pressure and what distinguished those with successful development and approvals from diseases not treated or without orphan drug designation.

METHODS

Analysis of the FDA database for orphan drug designations through descriptive and comparative statistics.

RESULTS

Between 1983 and 2013, fourteen drugs for seven conditions received FDA approval. Overall, orphan drug status was designated 70 times for 20 conditions. Approved therapies were enzyme replacement therapies (N = 10), substrate reduction therapies (N = 1), small molecules facilitating lysosomal substrate transportation (N = 3). FDA approval was significantly associated with a disease prevalence higher than 0.5/100,000 (p = 0.00742) and clinical development programs that did not require a primary neurological endpoint (p = 0.00059). Orphan drug status was designated for enzymes, modified enzymes, fusion proteins, chemical chaperones, small molecules leading to substrate reduction, or facilitating subcellular substrate transport, stem cells as well as gene therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug development focused on more common diseases. Primarily neurological diseases were neglected. Small clinical trials with either somatic or biomarker endpoints were successful. Enzyme replacement therapy was the most successful technology. Four factors played a key role in successful orphan drug development or orphan drug designations: 1) prevalence of disease 2) endpoints 3) regulatory precedent, and 4) technology platform. Successful development seeded further innovation.

摘要

背景

溶酶体贮积症是一组约50种单基因遗传性罕见病。一种缺陷导致复杂分子在溶酶体中蓄积,患者会出现复杂的多系统表型,发病率高,常伴有过早死亡。30多年前,1983年的《孤儿药法案》在美国通过立法,旨在促进罕见病药物的研发。我们致力于评估哪些溶酶体疾病存在药物研发压力,以及成功研发并获批的疾病与未治疗或未获得孤儿药认定的疾病有何不同。

方法

通过描述性和比较性统计分析美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的孤儿药认定数据库。

结果

1983年至2013年期间,针对7种疾病的14种药物获得了FDA批准。总体而言,20种疾病被认定为孤儿药状态70次。获批的疗法包括酶替代疗法(N = 10)、底物减少疗法(N = 1)、促进溶酶体底物运输的小分子药物(N = 3)。FDA批准与疾病患病率高于0.5/10万(p = 0.00742)以及不需要主要神经学终点的临床研发项目显著相关(p = 0.00059)。孤儿药状态被认定用于酶、修饰酶、融合蛋白、化学伴侣、导致底物减少或促进亚细胞底物运输的小分子、干细胞以及基因疗法。

结论

药物研发集中在更常见的疾病上。主要的神经学疾病被忽视。以体细胞或生物标志物为终点的小型临床试验取得了成功。酶替代疗法是最成功的技术。四个因素在孤儿药的成功研发或孤儿药认定中起关键作用:1)疾病患病率;2)终点;3)监管先例;4)技术平台。成功的研发催生了进一步的创新。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2247/4404669/bca2f18ceacc/13023_2015_262_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
FDA orphan drug designations for lysosomal storage disorders - a cross-sectional analysis.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 8;15(4):e0230898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230898. eCollection 2020.
3
Therapies for inborn errors of metabolism: what has the orphan drug act delivered?
Pediatrics. 2010 Jul;126(1):101-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3246. Epub 2010 Jun 21.
5
Incentives for orphan drug research and development in the United States.
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008 Dec 16;3:33. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-3-33.
6
What the Orphan Drug Act has done lately for children with rare diseases: a 10-year analysis.
Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):516-21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1798. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
7
Do investors value the FDA orphan drug designation?
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Jun 19;12(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0665-6.
8
The US Orphan Drug Act: rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity?
Health Policy. 2010 May;95(2-3):216-28. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.12.001. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
10
Thirty Years of Orphan Drug Legislation and the Development of Drugs to Treat Rare Seizure Conditions: A Cross Sectional Analysis.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 24;11(8):e0161660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161660. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Bringing enzymes to the proximity party.
RSC Chem Biol. 2023 Sep 29;4(12):986-1002. doi: 10.1039/d3cb00084b. eCollection 2023 Nov 29.
2
Moving away from one disease at a time: Screening, trial design, and regulatory implications of novel platform technologies.
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2023 Mar;193(1):30-43. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.32031. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
3
Polymer-based drug delivery systems under investigation for enzyme replacement and other therapies of lysosomal storage disorders.
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023 Jun;197:114683. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114683. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
4
Orphan drug development in alpha-1 antitypsin deficiency.
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 15;12(1):15497. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19707-2.
5
The past, present, and future of enzyme-based therapies.
Drug Discov Today. 2022 Jan;27(1):117-133. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
6
The drug development pipeline for glioblastoma-A cross sectional assessment of the FDA Orphan Drug Product designation database.
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 7;16(7):e0252924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252924. eCollection 2021.
7
Nanofibrous Formulation of Cyclodextrin Stabilized Lipases for Efficient Pancreatin Replacement Therapies.
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Jun 27;13(7):972. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13070972.
8
Lysosomal Diseases and Neuropsychiatry: Opportunities to Rebalance the Mind.
Front Mol Biosci. 2020 Aug 26;7:177. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00177. eCollection 2020.
9
FDA orphan drug designations for lysosomal storage disorders - a cross-sectional analysis.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 8;15(4):e0230898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230898. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomarkers for disease progression and AAV therapeutic efficacy in feline Sandhoff disease.
Exp Neurol. 2015 Jan;263:102-12. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.09.020. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
2
Oral cysteamine bitartrate and N-acetylcysteine for patients with infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis: a pilot study.
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Aug;13(8):777-87. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70142-5. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
3
Enzyme replacement therapy for lysosomal storage diseases.
Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2012 Oct;10 Suppl 1:26-34.
4
Assessment of neurological and behavioural function: the NIH Toolbox.
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Feb;9(2):138-9. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70335-7.
6
Randomized, controlled trial of miglustat in Gaucher's disease type 3.
Ann Neurol. 2008 Nov;64(5):514-22. doi: 10.1002/ana.21491.
7
Cognitive outcome in treated patients with chronic neuronopathic Gaucher disease.
J Pediatr. 2008 Jul;153(1):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.12.023. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
8
Does orphan drug legislation really answer the needs of patients?
Lancet. 2008 Jun 14;371(9629):2041-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60873-9.
9
Miglustat for treatment of Niemann-Pick C disease: a randomised controlled study.
Lancet Neurol. 2007 Sep;6(9):765-72. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70194-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验