Suppr超能文献

非特定型进食障碍(EDNOS)是一种具有临床相关性的进食障碍,与神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症相当。

[EDNOS is an eating disorder of clinical relevance, on a par with anorexia and bulimia nervosa].

作者信息

Dingemans A E, van Furth E F

出版信息

Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2015;57(4):258-64.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The category 'eating disorder 'not otherwise specified'' (EDNOS) in DSM-IV is restricted to eating disorders of clinical severity that do not completely fulfil the criteria for anorexia and bulimia nervosa. The EDNOS category is, by definition, often regarded as a a residual category and in principle designed to incorporate a small group of patients with atypical characteristics. Health insurance companies argue that the treatment of patients diagnosed with EDNOS should not be treated in mental health institutions and therefore should not get their treatment costs reimbursed by the insurance companies. The most important argument of the insurance companies is that patients in the EDNOS category do not display serious psychiatric symptoms.

AIM

The aim of this paper is to show that EDNOS is an eating disorder category of clinical relevance. The article provides a critical overview of literature on EDNOS which studies the prevalence, severity and course of the disorder. We also discuss to what extent the fifth version of dsm solves the problems relating to this residual category.

METHOD

We reviewed the literature.

RESULTS

The classification given in DSM-IV is not an accurate reflection of clinical reality. Half of the patients presenting with an eating disorder and seeking treatment do meet the criteria for EDNOS. The duration and the severity of eating disorder psychopathology, the presence of comorbidity, the mortality, and the use of the mental health care services by individuals with an eating disorder appear to be very similar in EDNOS patients and in patients with anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Eating disorder classifications can be regarded as snapshots taken throughout the course of an illness. Over of the years patients can be afflicted with various subtypes of an eating disorder. DSM-5 places fewer patients in the EDNOS category that did DSM-IV.

CONCLUSION

In the latest version of dsm, namely DSM-5, the number of patients with an eating disorder classified as EDNOS has declined. There appears to be sufficient scientific evidence for EDNOS to be considered as an eating-disorder category of clinical severity, comparable to anorexia and bulimia nervosa. In our view, patients classified as having EDNOS should be offered regular treatment in mental health institutions.

摘要

背景

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中“未另行规定的进食障碍”(EDNOS)类别仅限于临床严重程度的进食障碍,这些障碍不完全符合神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症的标准。根据定义,EDNOS类别通常被视为一个残余类别,原则上旨在纳入一小群具有非典型特征的患者。健康保险公司认为,被诊断为EDNOS的患者不应在精神卫生机构接受治疗,因此其治疗费用不应由保险公司报销。保险公司最重要的论点是,EDNOS类别的患者没有表现出严重的精神症状。

目的

本文旨在表明EDNOS是一种具有临床相关性的进食障碍类别。本文对有关EDNOS的文献进行了批判性综述,这些文献研究了该障碍的患病率、严重程度和病程。我们还讨论了DSM第五版在多大程度上解决了与这个残余类别相关的问题。

方法

我们对文献进行了综述。

结果

DSM-IV中的分类并不能准确反映临床现实。一半出现进食障碍并寻求治疗的患者确实符合EDNOS的标准。EDNOS患者与神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症患者在进食障碍精神病理学的持续时间和严重程度、共病情况、死亡率以及使用精神卫生保健服务方面似乎非常相似。进食障碍分类可被视为疾病过程中的快照。多年来,患者可能会患上进食障碍的各种亚型。与DSM-IV相比,DSM-5将更少的患者归类为EDNOS。

结论

在DSM的最新版本即DSM-5中,被归类为EDNOS的进食障碍患者数量有所下降。似乎有足够的科学证据表明EDNOS应被视为与神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症相当的具有临床严重程度的进食障碍类别。我们认为,被归类为患有EDNOS的患者应在精神卫生机构接受常规治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验