Cheng Chong-Qing, Zhang Rui-Tao, Xiong Yu, Chen Li, Wang Jian, Huang Guo-Hua, Li Ke-Quan, Zhang Lian, Bai Jin
From State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound Engineering in Medicine Co-founded by Chongqing and the Ministry of Science and Technology (CQC, RTZ, JW, GHH, KQL, LZ, JB), Chongqing Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (RTZ), Fuling Central Hospital; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (YX, LC, KQL), Chongqing Haifu Hospital; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JW), Three Gorges Central Hospital, Chongqing; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (GHH), Suining Central Hospital, Sichuan, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Apr;94(16):e729. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000729.
As a noninvasive treatment technique, ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been considered as a routine treatment for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis in China. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been proposed as another option to assess the treatment efficacy during HIFU treatment. The aim of this investigation is to evaluate the adverse effects of HIFU ablation for benign uterine diseases in a group of patients studied with ultrasound contrast agent (UCA), in comparison with a group of patients not exposed to UCA. From November 2010 to December 2013, 2604 patients with benign uterine diseases were treated with HIFU. Among them, 1300 patients were exposed to an UCA, whereas 1304 patients were not.During HIFU procedure, the incidences of leg pain, sacral/buttock pain, groin pain, treatment area pain, and the discomfort "hot" sensation on skin were higher in the patients who were exposed to SonoVue (Bracco, Milan, Italy) than those who were not (20.5% vs 11.7%, 52.5% vs 42.3%, 6.5% vs 4.5%, 68.9% vs 55.4%, and 48.1% vs 42.9%, respectively). Among the postoperative adverse effects, the incidence of lower abdominal pain was significantly higher in patients who were exposed to an UCA than those who were not (51.2% vs 39.9%, P < 0.05). Two patients who were exposed to an UCA had acute renal function failure.In conclusion, UCA may increase the incidences of some common HIFU-related adverse effects during HIFU treatment for benign uterine diseases, but most of which were acceptable and self-limited. After HIFU treatment, renal function should be monitored in patients with a history of hypertension or taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
作为一种非侵入性治疗技术,超声引导下高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)在中国已被视为子宫肌瘤和子宫腺肌病的常规治疗方法。超声造影(CEUS)已被提议作为评估HIFU治疗期间治疗效果的另一种选择。本研究的目的是评估在一组使用超声造影剂(UCA)的患者中,与未使用UCA的患者组相比,HIFU消融治疗良性子宫疾病的不良反应。2010年11月至2013年12月,2604例良性子宫疾病患者接受了HIFU治疗。其中,1300例患者使用了UCA,而1304例患者未使用。在HIFU治疗过程中,使用声诺维(意大利米兰,Bracco公司)的患者出现腿痛、骶部/臀部疼痛、腹股沟疼痛、治疗区域疼痛以及皮肤“热”感不适的发生率高于未使用的患者(分别为20.5%对11.7%、52.5%对42.3%、6.5%对4.5%、68.9%对55.4%以及48.1%对42.9%)。在术后不良反应中,使用UCA的患者下腹部疼痛的发生率显著高于未使用的患者(51.2%对39.9%,P<0.05)。两名使用UCA的患者出现急性肾功能衰竭。总之,UCA可能会增加HIFU治疗良性子宫疾病期间一些常见的与HIFU相关的不良反应的发生率,但大多数不良反应是可接受的且为自限性。HIFU治疗后,有高血压病史或正在服用非甾体类抗炎药的患者应监测肾功能。