Jenkins Thomas L, Baker Mary Grace, Baheti Aparna R, Sharma Aditya M, Patrie James T, Angle J Fritz, Matsumoto Alan H
University of Virginia School of Medicine, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA 22908.
Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA 22908.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 May;26(5):625-33; quiz 634. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.01.027.
To examine if the outcomes after endovascular treatment in hypertensive patients with renal artery fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) and incidental atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) differ from the outcomes in patients with FMD alone.
All cases of patients with renal artery FMD undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty during the period 2002-2012 were reviewed. The patients with complete data before and after the procedure were identified (N = 84). Based on the procedural reports, these patients were separated into two cohorts: patients with isolated FMD (n = 59) and patients with concomitant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and FMD (ARAS-FMD) (n = 25). The medical record of each patient was reviewed for baseline blood pressure, antihypertensive medication use, and renal function data and the same data after the procedure. Procedural details including the angiographic findings, the number of stents placed, the average number of revascularization procedures, and the number of patients requiring more than one revascularization procedure were noted.
The study population included 68 patients (FMD, n = 46; ARAS-FMD, n = 22). Patients in the FMD and ARAS-FMD cohorts experienced comparable significant decreases in systolic and mean arterial pressures after endovascular intervention. There was no change in the number of antihypertensive medications after the procedure within or between groups. Patients in the ARAS-FMD cohort had lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rates (P = .007); however, renal function stabilized in both groups after endovascular therapy.
Patients with ARAS-FMD respond to endovascular therapy with outcomes similar to patients with isolated renal artery FMD.
探讨高血压合并肾动脉纤维肌发育不良(FMD)及偶发性动脉粥样硬化性肾动脉狭窄(ARAS)患者血管内治疗后的结果是否与单纯FMD患者不同。
回顾2002年至2012年期间接受经皮腔内血管成形术的所有肾动脉FMD患者病例。确定手术前后有完整数据的患者(N = 84)。根据手术报告,将这些患者分为两个队列:孤立性FMD患者(n = 59)和合并动脉粥样硬化性肾动脉狭窄及FMD患者(ARAS-FMD)(n = 25)。查阅每位患者的病历以获取基线血压、抗高血压药物使用情况和肾功能数据以及手术后的相同数据。记录手术细节,包括血管造影结果、置入支架数量、平均血管重建手术次数以及需要不止一次血管重建手术的患者数量。
研究人群包括68例患者(FMD,n = 46;ARAS-FMD,n = 22)。FMD队列和ARAS-FMD队列患者在血管内介入治疗后收缩压和平均动脉压均有显著下降,且两组间及组内手术后抗高血压药物数量均无变化。ARAS-FMD队列患者的基线估计肾小球滤过率较低(P = 0.007);然而,血管内治疗后两组肾功能均稳定。
ARAS-FMD患者对血管内治疗的反应与孤立性肾动脉FMD患者相似。