Manias Chris
*Department of History, Samuel Alexander Building-N2.14, School of Arts, Languages and Cultures,the University of Manchester,Manchester, M13 9PL. Email:
Br J Hist Sci. 2015 Jun;48(2):289-319. doi: 10.1017/S0007087414000909.
The Peking Man fossils discovered at Zhoukoudian in north-east China in the 1920s and 1930s were some of the most extensive palaeoanthropological finds of the twentieth century. This article examines their publicization and discussion in Britain, where they were engaged with by some of the world's leading authorities in human evolution, and a media and public highly interested in human-origins research. This international link - simultaneously promoted by scientists in China and in Britain itself - reflected wider debates on international networks; the role of science in the modern world; and changing definitions of race, progress and human nature. This article illustrates how human-origins research was an important means of binding these areas together and presenting scientific work as simultaneously authoritative and credible, but also evoking mystery and adventurousness. Examining this illustrates important features of contemporary views of both science and human development, showing not only the complexities of contemporary regard for the international and public dynamics of scientific research, but wider concerns over human nature, which oscillated between optimistic notions of unity and progress and pessimistic ones of essential differences and misdirected development.
20世纪20年代和30年代在中国东北部周口店发现的北京猿人化石是20世纪最丰富的古人类学发现之一。本文考察了这些化石在英国的宣传与讨论情况,当时一些世界顶尖的人类进化权威以及对人类起源研究兴趣浓厚的媒体和公众参与了相关讨论。这种国际联系——由中英两国科学家共同推动——反映了关于国际网络、科学在现代世界中的作用以及种族、进步和人性定义变化的更广泛辩论。本文阐述了人类起源研究如何成为将这些领域联系在一起的重要手段,并将科学工作呈现为既具权威性又可信,同时还能引发神秘感和冒险精神。审视这一点揭示了当代科学观和人类发展观的重要特征,不仅展现了当代对科研国际和公众动态关注的复杂性,还反映了对人性更广泛的担忧,这种担忧在关于统一与进步的乐观观念和关于本质差异与发展方向错误的悲观观念之间摇摆不定。