Smith J A, O'Hare M
Department of Biochemistry, University of Liverpool, U.K.
J Chromatogr. 1989 Nov 10;496(1):71-82.
A number of different stationary phases designed for hydrophobic interaction chromatography have been examined to assess their efficiency and resolving capability with respect to protein and peptide mixtures. A packing with an ether-bonded phase was substantially less hydrophobic than those with propyl- or phenyl-bonded surface chemistry. While the overall efficiencies of most columns were broadly similar with respect to most proteins, some proteins did chromatograph with enhanced efficiency on specific packings. The elution order of individual proteins was, with one or two exceptions, similar for all columns tested using comparable mobile phases. It differed, however, substantially from orders obtained with conventional reversed-phase alkyl-bonded phases and from the elution orders obtained when the hydrophobic packings were used in a reversed-phase mode, i.e. with an organic modifier gradient. Varying the salt used in the mobile phase and its pH under hydrophobic interaction conditions (high ionic strength) changed overall retentivities and also altered specific retention orders, thus offering possibilities of selective resolution of some mixtures.
为了评估其对蛋白质和肽混合物的效率及分离能力,人们对多种为疏水相互作用色谱法设计的不同固定相进行了研究。一种带有醚键合相的填料的疏水性明显低于那些具有丙基或苯基键合表面化学性质的填料。虽然大多数色谱柱对大多数蛋白质的整体效率大致相似,但某些蛋白质在特定填料上的色谱分离效率更高。在使用可比流动相的情况下,所有测试色谱柱上单个蛋白质的洗脱顺序,除了一两个例外,基本相似。然而,它与使用传统反相烷基键合相获得的洗脱顺序以及当疏水填料以反相模式使用时(即采用有机改性剂梯度)获得的洗脱顺序有很大不同。在疏水相互作用条件下(高离子强度)改变流动相中使用的盐及其pH值,会改变整体保留率,也会改变特定的保留顺序,从而为某些混合物的选择性分离提供了可能。