Gene editing poses challenges for journals.
作者信息
Cressey Daniel, Cyranoski David
出版信息
Nature. 2015 Apr 30;520(7549):594. doi: 10.1038/520594a.
DOI:10.1038/520594a
PMID:25925451
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Gene editing poses challenges for journals.基因编辑给期刊带来了挑战。
Nature. 2015 Apr 30;520(7549):594. doi: 10.1038/520594a.
2
Prospect of human cloning poses dilemma for journals.人类克隆的前景给期刊带来了两难困境。
Nature. 2003 Jan 16;421(6920):199. doi: 10.1038/421199a.
3
On cloning research, peer review and the possibility of fraud.关于克隆研究、同行评审及欺诈的可能性。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006 Mar;33(3):235-6. doi: 10.1007/s00259-006-1987-0.
4
A suggested code of conduct for editors of peer-reviewed journals.同行评审期刊编辑行为准则建议。
J Wound Care. 2006 Feb;15(2):85-6. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2006.15.2.26869.
5
Publication ethics and COPE.出版伦理与出版伦理委员会
Medwave. 2016 May 31;16(4):e6456. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2016.04.6456.
6
Standards for ethical publication.伦理出版标准。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2007 Jan-Feb;28(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2006.11.002.
7
Caging the pack.将群体圈住。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2016 Jun;124(6):371-2. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21748.
8
Publication ethics.出版伦理
Public Health Nurs. 2009 May-Jun;26(3):205-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2009.00772.x.
9
[Publication ethics--responsibility of all].[出版伦理——人人有责]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010 Feb 11;130(3):259. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.10.0014.
10
Embryo editing sparks epic debate.胚胎编辑引发了激烈的争论。
Nature. 2015 Apr 30;520(7549):593-4. doi: 10.1038/520593a.
引用本文的文献
1
The ethics of clinical applications of germline genome modification: a systematic review of reasons.生殖系基因组编辑的临床应用伦理：原因的系统评价
Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1777-1796. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey257.
2
US Competitiveness in Synthetic Biology.美国在合成生物学方面的竞争力。
Health Secur. 2015 Nov-Dec;13(6):378-89. doi: 10.1089/hs.2015.0046.
Zotero 插件