Pak Patricia, Jawed Hina, Tirone Christina, Lamb Bethany, Cott Cheryl, Brunton Karen, Mansfield Avril, Inness Elizabeth L
Department of Physical Therapy.
Department of Physical Therapy ; Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Toronto ; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute ; Toronto Western Research Institute, University Health Network.
Physiother Can. 2015 Winter;67(1):1-8. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2013-63.
To describe the perspectives of people with stroke and their physiotherapists on the use of biomechanics technology to assess balance and mobility.
This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with patients with stroke and a focus group with their physiotherapists. Coding of interview and focus-group data used a line-by-line inductive approach, with qualitative software to develop codes into themes.
The quantitative data from the assessment were seen as beneficial to providing patients with insight into balance and mobility problems. Physiotherapists found that the assessment confirmed clinical reasoning and aided in precise evaluation of progress but expressed mixed opinions as to whether treatment choice was influenced. Patients would have liked more communication regarding the purpose of the assessment. Patients also stated that trust in their physiotherapists helped them overcome anxieties and that confidence was gained through exposure to more challenging balance assessments. Physiotherapists advocated for the use of a harness system to safely incorporate reactive balance control assessment and training into practice.
Both patients and therapists saw value in the quantitative data provided by the assessment. Regardless of the technology used, patients value a strong physiotherapist-patient relationship. Ongoing collaboration between clinicians and researchers should guide the evolution of technology into clinically useful tools.
描述中风患者及其物理治疗师对使用生物力学技术评估平衡和移动能力的看法。
这项定性研究采用了对中风患者的半结构化访谈以及与他们的物理治疗师进行的焦点小组讨论。访谈和焦点小组数据的编码采用逐行归纳法,使用定性软件将代码发展为主题。
评估中的定量数据被认为有助于让患者深入了解平衡和移动能力问题。物理治疗师发现,该评估证实了临床推理并有助于精确评估进展,但对于治疗选择是否受到影响,他们表达了不同意见。患者希望能更多地了解评估的目的。患者还表示,对物理治疗师的信任帮助他们克服了焦虑,并且通过接受更具挑战性的平衡评估获得了信心。物理治疗师主张使用安全带系统,以便在实践中安全地纳入反应性平衡控制评估和训练。
患者和治疗师都认为评估提供的定量数据有价值。无论使用何种技术,患者都重视牢固的物理治疗师 - 患者关系。临床医生和研究人员之间的持续合作应指导技术发展成为临床有用的工具。