Mattson Margaret E, Cai Rong, Woodward Albert
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration Services Administration, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857 (overnight mail use 20850), USA.
Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration Services Administration, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857 (overnight mail use 20850), USA.
J Safety Res. 2015 Jun;53:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
Emergency department (ED) visits resulting from motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) among individuals younger than 21 impaired by alcohol and/or drugs have been less studied than MVC fatalities.
Using data from 2004 to 2011, we compare the magnitude and pattern of national ED visit and mortality data for alcohol- and drug-impaired youths involved in MVCs.
Temporal patterns of ED visits are similar to those of fatalities, but the two differ in magnitude. The ratio of ED visits to fatalities is 3.5:1; alcohol related events involvement dominates other drugs in both categories.
The volume of injuries serious enough to warrant ED visits imposes significant health, social, and financial burdens. In ED visits, alcohol is the prime source of MVC morbidity burden; other drugs consistently contribute less.
These incidents are persistent and require interventions aimed at multiple levels of prevention, including stricter corrective steps earlier in the impaired driving career to reduce subsequent incidents. ED visits for MVC injuries can be important "teachable moments." Limitations of the study indicate the need for improved surveillance of underage substance-involved crashes.
与机动车碰撞事故(MVC)相关的急诊就诊情况,在21岁以下因酒精和/或药物而受损的个体中,相比MVC导致的死亡情况,受到的研究较少。
利用2004年至2011年的数据,我们比较了因MVC而涉及酒精和药物受损的青少年的全国急诊就诊和死亡率数据的规模及模式。
急诊就诊的时间模式与死亡情况相似,但两者在规模上有所不同。急诊就诊与死亡的比例为3.5:1;在这两类情况中,与酒精相关的事件占主导地位,超过其他药物。
严重到需要急诊就诊的伤害数量带来了重大的健康、社会和经济负担。在急诊就诊中,酒精是MVC发病负担的主要来源;其他药物的影响一直较小。
这些事件持续存在,需要针对多个预防层面进行干预,包括在驾驶受损生涯早期采取更严格的纠正措施,以减少后续事件。因MVC受伤而进行的急诊就诊可能是重要的“可教育时机”。本研究的局限性表明需要加强对涉及未成年人物质使用的撞车事故的监测。