Department of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center of Japan, 3256 Midori-cho, Tachikawa, Tokyo, 190-0014, Japan; Department of Medical Informatics, National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center of Japan, 3256 Midori-cho, Tachikawa, Tokyo, 190-0014, Japan.
Department of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center of Japan, 3256 Midori-cho, Tachikawa, Tokyo, 190-0014, Japan.
Thromb Res. 2015 Jul;136(1):20-3. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.03.029. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
Recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM) is a promising anticoagulant. Improvements in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and the amelioration of bleeding complications in DIC patients were reported to be greater with rTM therapy than with unfractionated heparin therapy. However, it remains unknown whether rTM therapy affects the outcomes of patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML).
We retrospectively analyzed 103 patients with AML and compared outcomes between patients treated with low molecular weight heparin therapy and rTM. The diagnostic criteria for DIC were previously proposed by the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare. Comparisons between qualitative variables were carried out using the χ(2) test. Survival probabilities were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences in survival distributions were evaluated using the log-rank test.
Forty-seven patients developed DIC due to chemotherapy or their disease status. Fourteen patients were treated with rTM, while 33 patients were treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). The log-rank test revealed that overall survival was significantly worse in the DIC group than in the non-DIC group (P=0.003), and was signfiacntly better in the rTM group than the LMWH group (P=0.016).
rTM was more efficient than LMWH because of the improvements it induced in overall survival.
重组血栓调节蛋白(rTM)是一种有前途的抗凝剂。与未分级肝素治疗相比,rTM 治疗可改善弥漫性血管内凝血(DIC)并减少 DIC 患者的出血并发症。然而,rTM 治疗是否影响急性髓细胞白血病(AML)患者的预后尚不清楚。
我们回顾性分析了 103 例 AML 患者,并比较了低分子肝素治疗和 rTM 治疗患者的结局。DIC 的诊断标准先前由日本厚生劳动省提出。使用卡方检验比较定性变量。通过 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计生存概率,并使用对数秩检验评估生存分布的差异。
47 例患者因化疗或疾病状态发生 DIC。14 例患者接受 rTM 治疗,33 例患者接受低分子肝素(LMWH)治疗。log-rank 检验显示,DIC 组的总生存率明显低于非 DIC 组(P=0.003),rTM 组的总生存率明显高于 LMWH 组(P=0.016)。
rTM 比 LMWH 更有效,因为它改善了总体生存率。