Suppr超能文献

对因特定程序转入三级肿瘤重症监护病房的患者进行的分析。

An analysis of patients transferred to a tertiary oncological intensive care unit for defined procedures.

作者信息

Kamat Sunil, Chawla Sanjay, Rajendram Prabalini, Pastores Stephen M, Kostelecky Natalie, Halpern Neil A

机构信息

At the time of this study Sunil Kamat and Prabalini Rajendram were fellows, Sanjay Chawla is an assistant attending physician, Stephen M. Pastores is the critical care fellowship program director, Natalie Kostelecky is a research nurse, and Neil A. Halpern is the chief, Critical Care Medicine Service, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 2015 May;24(3):241-7. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015174.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Up to 50 000 intensive care unit interhospital transfers occur annually in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of cancer patients transferred from an intensive care unit in one hospital to another intensive care unit at an oncological center and to evaluate whether interventions planned before transfer were performed.

METHODS

Data on transfers for planned interventions from January 2008 through December 2012 were identified retrospectively. Demographic and clinical variables, receipt of planned interventions, and outcome data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 4625 admissions to an intensive care unit at the oncological center, 143 (3%) were transfers from intensive care units of other hospitals. Of these, 47 (33%) were transfers for planned interventions. Patients' mean age was 57 years, and 68% were men. At the time of intensive care unit transfer, 20 (43%) were receiving mechanical ventilation. Interventions included management of airway (n = 19) or gastrointestinal (n = 2) obstruction, treatment of tumor bleeding (n = 12), chemotherapy (n = 10), and other (n = 4). A total of 37 patients (79%) received the planned interventions within 48 hours of intensive care unit arrival; 10 (21%) did not because their signs and symptoms abated. Median intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay at the oncological center were 4 and 13 days, respectively. Intensive care unit and hospital mortality rates were 11% and 19%, respectively. Deaths occurred only in patients who received interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Interhospital transfers of cancer patients to an intensive care unit at an oncological center are infrequent but are most commonly done for direct interventional care. Most patients received planned interventions soon after transfer.

摘要

背景

在美国,每年有多达50000例重症监护病房的院际转运。

目的

确定从一家医院的重症监护病房转至肿瘤中心另一家重症监护病房的癌症患者的患病率、特征及结局,并评估转运前计划的干预措施是否得到实施。

方法

回顾性确定2008年1月至2012年12月计划干预措施的转运数据。分析人口统计学和临床变量、计划干预措施的实施情况及结局数据。

结果

在肿瘤中心重症监护病房收治的4625例患者中,143例(3%)是从其他医院重症监护病房转运而来。其中,47例(33%)是因计划干预措施而转运。患者的平均年龄为57岁,68%为男性。在重症监护病房转运时,20例(43%)正在接受机械通气。干预措施包括气道(n = 19)或胃肠道(n = 2)梗阻的处理、肿瘤出血的治疗(n = 12)、化疗(n = 10)及其他(n = 4)。共有37例患者(79%)在抵达重症监护病房后48小时内接受了计划干预措施;10例(21%)未接受,因为其体征和症状缓解。在肿瘤中心,重症监护病房和医院的中位住院时间分别为4天和13天。重症监护病房和医院的死亡率分别为11%和19%。死亡仅发生在接受干预措施的患者中。

结论

癌症患者转至肿瘤中心重症监护病房的院际转运并不常见,但最常见的原因是直接介入治疗。大多数患者在转运后不久接受了计划干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验