Suppr超能文献

分析天然石棉中蛇纹石多型体。

Analysis of serpentine polymorphs in investigations of natural occurrences of asbestos.

机构信息

California Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Laboratory Branch, 850 Marina Bay Parkway, G365/EHLB, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.

出版信息

Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2015 May;17(5):985-96. doi: 10.1039/c5em00089k. Epub 2015 May 5.

Abstract

This work investigates potential analytical variability in environmental investigations of natural occurrences of asbestos (NOA) due to intergrown serpentine minerals. Franciscan complex and serpentinite rock samples were obtained from likely NOA sites in coastal Northern California with geographic information system (GIS) maps, then analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM), transmission electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray analysis and selected area electron diffraction (TEM/SAED/EDS), and environmental scanning electron microscopy with EDS (ESEM/EDS). Non-asbestos serpentine fibers were superficially similar to chrysotile but were differentiated quickly using TEM morphology criteria and reference SAED overlays. 94 NOA fibers were classified as asbestiform chrysotile (62%), polygonal serpentine (34%), lizardite scrolls (2%), and lizardite laths (2%). Chrysotile fibril widths (mean = 42 nm) were significantly different from those of polygonal serpentine and lizardite laths (167 and 505 nm, respectively), but not lizardite scrolls (37 nm). Due to differing preparations and microscope resolutions, TEM analyses investigated a distinct, smaller population of particles (0.01-10 μm) than did PLM analyses (10-100 μm). A higher proportion of asbestiform phases in the finer fraction could potentially bias TEM bulk percent asbestos determinations. ESEM/EDS of intermediate particle size ranges revealed 20-200 μm, elongated particles with intermixed asbestiform and non-asbestiform structures on their surfaces. These particles were too thick and complex to be resolved by PLM, and too massive to be detected by TEM. These large particles are likely to exist in samples prepared by mechanical crushing or grinding, but are not likely to be generated by "releasable asbestos" methods.

摘要

这项工作研究了由于共生蛇纹石矿物而导致的自然存在的石棉(NOA)环境调查中的潜在分析变异性。弗朗西斯科复合体和蛇纹岩样品是从加利福尼亚州北部沿海可能的 NOA 地点用地理信息系统(GIS)地图获得的,然后使用偏光显微镜(PLM)、透射电子显微镜与能量色散 X 射线分析和选区电子衍射(TEM/SAED/EDS)以及环境扫描电子显微镜与 EDS(ESEM/EDS)进行分析。非石棉蛇纹石纤维在表面上与温石棉相似,但使用 TEM 形态标准和参考 SAED 叠加可以快速区分。94 根 NOA 纤维被分类为纤维状温石棉(62%)、多角形蛇纹石(34%)、卷曲片岩(2%)和纤蛇纹石板(2%)。温石棉原纤宽度(平均值为 42nm)与多角形蛇纹石和纤蛇纹石板(分别为 167nm 和 505nm)明显不同,但与卷曲片岩(37nm)不同。由于制备方法和显微镜分辨率的不同,TEM 分析调查的粒子(0.01-10μm)与 PLM 分析(10-100μm)的粒子不同。更细部分中纤维状相的比例较高,可能会使 TEM 整体石棉百分比测定产生偏差。中间粒径范围的 ESEM/EDS 揭示了 20-200μm、拉长的颗粒,其表面混合有纤维状和非纤维状结构。这些颗粒太厚太复杂,PLM 无法分辨,TEM 也无法检测到。这些大颗粒可能存在于机械粉碎或研磨制备的样品中,但不太可能由“可释放石棉”方法产生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验