• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本仿制药的监管:现状与未来展望

Regulation of Generic Drugs in Japan: the Current Situation and Future Prospects.

作者信息

Kuribayashi Ryosuke, Matsuhama Maki, Mikami Kenichi

机构信息

Office of Generic Drugs, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, 3-3-2, Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0013, Japan,

出版信息

AAPS J. 2015 Sep;17(5):1312-6. doi: 10.1208/s12248-015-9777-x. Epub 2015 May 6.

DOI:10.1208/s12248-015-9777-x
PMID:25943503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4540728/
Abstract

Generic drugs are interchangeable with original proprietary drugs, as they have the same active pharmaceutical ingredients, dosage forms, strength, quality, indications, effects, directions, and dosage. The cost of generic drugs is lower than original drugs, because the developmental cost is lower. The expansion of medical expenses is an important issue in many countries, including Japan, the USA, and Europe, and promotion of generic drugs has been demanded to solve this issue in Japan. Generic drug approval review in Japan is conducted by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), which reviews the equivalence of the original drugs from the viewpoint of quality, efficacy, and safety, based on documentation submitted by the generic drug applicants. However, the details of the generic drug review in Japan have not been reported. In this report, we introduce the application types, the number of applications and approvals, and the review timeline of generic drugs in Japan. In addition, we discuss recent consultations and future prospects.

摘要

仿制药与原研专利药可互换,因为它们具有相同的活性药物成分、剂型、强度、质量、适应症、效果、用法和用量。仿制药的成本低于原研药,因为其研发成本较低。医疗费用的增长是包括日本、美国和欧洲在内的许多国家的一个重要问题,在日本,人们要求推广仿制药以解决这一问题。日本的仿制药批准审查由药品和医疗器械局(PMDA)进行,该局根据仿制药申请人提交的文件,从质量、疗效和安全性的角度审查原研药的等效性。然而,日本仿制药审查的细节尚未报道。在本报告中,我们介绍了日本仿制药的申请类型、申请和批准数量以及审查时间表。此外,我们还讨论了近期的咨询情况和未来前景。

相似文献

1
Regulation of Generic Drugs in Japan: the Current Situation and Future Prospects.日本仿制药的监管:现状与未来展望
AAPS J. 2015 Sep;17(5):1312-6. doi: 10.1208/s12248-015-9777-x. Epub 2015 May 6.
2
Comparison of Generic Drug Reviews for Marketing Authorization between Japan and Canada.日本和加拿大药品上市许可通用名药品审评比较。
Drugs R D. 2017 Sep;17(3):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s40268-017-0186-8.
3
Bioequivalence Evaluations of Generic Dry Powder Inhaler Drug Products: Similarities and Differences Between Japan, USA, and the European Union.仿制药干粉吸入剂的生物等效性评估:日本、美国和欧盟之间的异同
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 Mar;56(3):225-233. doi: 10.1007/s40262-016-0438-8.
4
Current Regulation for Bioequivalence Evaluations of Generic Ophthalmic Dosage Forms in Japan.日本现行仿制药眼科剂型生物等效性评价规定。
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2020 Dec;45(6):697-702. doi: 10.1007/s13318-020-00646-0.
5
Generic Drug Product Development in Japan: Regulatory Updates During 2014-2019 and the Future.日本仿制药产品开发:2014 - 2019年监管更新及未来
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2021 Nov;46(6):711-719. doi: 10.1007/s13318-021-00720-1. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
6
Regulatory Considerations of Bioequivalence Studies for Oral Solid Dosage Forms in Japan.日本口服固体剂型生物等效性研究的监管考量
J Pharm Sci. 2016 Aug;105(8):2270-7. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.05.026. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
7
The ongoing regulation of generic drugs.仿制药的持续监管。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 15;357(20):1993-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078193.
8
Product-Specific Regulatory Pathways to Approve Generic Drugs: The Need for Follow-up Studies to Ensure Safety and Effectiveness.批准仿制药的特定产品监管途径:需要进行后续研究以确保安全性和有效性。
Drug Saf. 2015 Oct;38(10):849-53. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0315-7.
9
Generic drugs: the stalling game.仿制药:停滞不前的局面。
Consum Rep. 2001 Jul;66(7):36-40.
10
Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: cost savings. Issue brief.药品和医疗器械:成本节约。问题简报。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2012 Dec 31:1-33.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Utilization of Generic Drugs and Biosimilars for Ulcerative Colitis Treatment: Insights from a Nationwide Database Study in Japan.日本全国性数据库研究对溃疡性结肠炎治疗中仿制药和生物类似药临床应用情况的洞察
Inflamm Intest Dis. 2024 Jan 8;9(1):29-39. doi: 10.1159/000536146. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
A nationwide survey exploring physicians' and pharmacists' knowledge, awareness and perceptions regarding generic medicines in China.一项全国性调查,旨在探讨中国医生和药剂师对仿制药的知识、意识和看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 20;22(1):1069. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08438-9.
3
Generic Drug Usage in Dentistry across Japan: Analysis Using a Japanese National Database.日本牙科中通用名药物的使用情况:基于日本全国数据库的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 28;18(21):11329. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111329.
4
Generic Drug Product Development in Japan: Regulatory Updates During 2014-2019 and the Future.日本仿制药产品开发:2014 - 2019年监管更新及未来
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2021 Nov;46(6):711-719. doi: 10.1007/s13318-021-00720-1. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
5
Evaluation between the Usability and Physicochemical Property of Acyclovir Ointments.阿昔洛韦软膏的可用性与理化性质评估
J Pharm (Cairo). 2018 Aug 1;2018:8761394. doi: 10.1155/2018/8761394. eCollection 2018.
6
Regulatory requirements for the registration of generic medicines and format of drug dossiers: procedures in Sri Lanka in comparison with selected regulatory authorities.仿制药注册的监管要求及药品档案格式:斯里兰卡的程序与选定监管机构的比较
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2018 Jun 21;11:14. doi: 10.1186/s40545-018-0141-2. eCollection 2018.
7
Comparison of Generic Drug Reviews for Marketing Authorization between Japan and Canada.日本和加拿大药品上市许可通用名药品审评比较。
Drugs R D. 2017 Sep;17(3):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s40268-017-0186-8.
8
Main Reasons for Registration Application Refusal of Generic and Similar Pharmaceutical Drug Products by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA).巴西卫生监管机构(巴西国家卫生监督局,ANVISA)拒绝通用和类似药品注册申请的主要原因。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7894937. doi: 10.1155/2017/7894937. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
9
Comparison of the pharmacokinetics between L-BPA and L-FBPA using the same administration dose and protocol: a validation study for the theranostic approach using [F]-L-FBPA positron emission tomography in boron neutron capture therapy.使用相同给药剂量和方案比较L-BPA和L-FBPA的药代动力学:一项关于在硼中子俘获治疗中使用[F]-L-FBPA正电子发射断层扫描的诊疗方法的验证研究。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):859. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2913-x.

本文引用的文献

1
International guidelines for bioequivalence of systemically available orally administered generic drug products: a survey of similarities and differences.国际上用于口服全身可用仿制药生物等效性的指导原则:相似性和差异性的调查。
AAPS J. 2013 Oct;15(4):974-90. doi: 10.1208/s12248-013-9499-x. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
2
A theoretical basis for a biopharmaceutic drug classification: the correlation of in vitro drug product dissolution and in vivo bioavailability.生物药剂学药物分类的理论基础:体外药物溶出度与体内生物利用度的相关性。
Pharm Res. 1995 Mar;12(3):413-20. doi: 10.1023/a:1016212804288.