Suppr超能文献

介入专家对新的血管内试验的看法。

Interventionalist perspective on the new endovascular trials.

作者信息

Pierot Laurent, Derdeyn Colin

机构信息

From the Department of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Maison-Blanche, Reims, France (L.P.); and Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO (C.D.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2015 Jun;46(6):1440-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008416. Epub 2015 May 5.

Abstract

Three recently published trials have conclusively proven the benefit of mechanical endovascular thrombectomy over best medical therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion. These trials shared some features and differed in others. These similarities and differences in trial design and execution affect the conclusions and recommendations that can be made from the data. We will examine the implications of these studies for neurointerventionists, both for current practice and for future studies. In particular, we will focus on procedural details such as patient selection, devices, adjunctive therapies, treatment time windows, and performance metrics.

摘要

最近发表的三项试验已确凿证明,对于急性缺血性中风和大血管闭塞患者,机械血管内血栓切除术优于最佳药物治疗。这些试验有一些共同特征,也有一些不同之处。试验设计和实施中的这些异同影响着从数据中得出的结论和建议。我们将研究这些研究对神经介入医生的影响,包括对当前实践和未来研究的影响。特别是,我们将关注诸如患者选择、设备、辅助治疗、治疗时间窗和性能指标等程序细节。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验