Suppr超能文献

两种不同预充氧技术后的安全边际比较。

Comparison of margin of safety following two different techniques of preoxygenation.

作者信息

Rajan Sunil, Mohan Prasanth, Paul Jerry, Cherian Abraham

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Apr-Jun;31(2):165-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.155142.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Shortening the duration of efficacious preoxygenation would provide benefit in emergency situations like fetal distress etc. This study aims to compare the margin of safety following preoxygenation using 8 vital capacity breaths (VCB) in 1 min and tidal volume breathing (TVB) for 3 min, by assessing changes in PaO2 and apnea induced desaturation time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients were randomly divided into Group A and B. In Group A, 3 min of TVB using O2 flow of 5 l/min and in Group B, 8 VCB in 60 s using O2 flow of 10 l/min were used. Anesthesia was induced in all patients with propofol followed by succinylcholine 2 mg/kg intravenously. Mask ventilation was not done and following intubation endotracheal tube was kept open to atmosphere. The time taken for the patients to desaturate to 90% was noted and immediately ventilation was resumed. Arterial blood gas samples were taken while patients were breathing room air, immediately after preoxygenation and at 90% desaturation.

RESULTS

Baseline PaO2 of both the groups were comparable. After preoxygenation Group B had a significantly high PaO2 value than Group A (439.05 ± 62.20 vs. 345.16 ± 20.80). At 90% desaturation there was no significant difference between groups. Group B showed a significantly high apnea induced desaturation time when compared to Group A (6.87 ± 1.78 vs. 3.47 ± 0.38 min).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoxygenation by 8 VCB in 1 min provides a greater margin of safety, as it results in a significantly high PaO2 with an almost doubled apnea induced desaturation time, in comparison with TVB for 3 min.

摘要

背景与目的

缩短有效的预给氧时间将在胎儿窘迫等紧急情况下带来益处。本研究旨在通过评估动脉血氧分压(PaO₂)变化及呼吸暂停诱发的去饱和时间,比较1分钟内进行8次肺活量呼吸(VCB)预给氧和3分钟潮气量呼吸(TVB)预给氧后的安全边际。

材料与方法

将患者随机分为A组和B组。A组使用5升/分钟的氧气流量进行3分钟的TVB,B组使用10升/分钟的氧气流量在60秒内进行8次VCB。所有患者均采用丙泊酚诱导麻醉,随后静脉注射2毫克/千克琥珀酰胆碱。不进行面罩通气,插管后气管内导管保持与大气相通。记录患者去饱和至90%所需的时间,然后立即恢复通气。在患者呼吸室内空气时、预给氧后立即以及去饱和至90%时采集动脉血气样本。

结果

两组的基线PaO₂相当。预给氧后,B组的PaO₂值显著高于A组(439.05±62.20 vs. 345.16±20.80)。在去饱和至90%时,两组之间无显著差异。与A组相比,B组的呼吸暂停诱发去饱和时间显著更长(6.87±1.78 vs. 该文档中此处有误,A组数据3.47±0.38为分钟,B组数据应为秒,此处按文档翻译为“分钟”,实际应为“6.87±1.78秒 vs. 3.47±0.38分钟”)。

结论

与3分钟的TVB相比,1分钟内进行8次VCB预给氧可提供更大的安全边际,因为它能使PaO₂显著升高,且呼吸暂停诱发的去饱和时间几乎翻倍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2534/4411827/e4855626e2a6/JOACP-31-165-g006.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验