Suppr超能文献

治疗药物监测能否优化血液系统恶性肿瘤伴发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的哌拉西林暴露量?一项随机对照试验。

Can therapeutic drug monitoring optimize exposure to piperacillin in febrile neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies? A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Sime Fekade Bruck, Roberts Michael S, Tiong Ing Soo, Gardner Julia H, Lehman Sheila, Peake Sandra L, Hahn Uwe, Warner Morgyn S, Roberts Jason A

机构信息

School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia Therapeutics Research Centre, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia Therapeutics Research Centre, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia Therapeutics Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Aug;70(8):2369-75. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv123. Epub 2015 May 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to describe piperacillin exposure in febrile neutropenia patients and determine whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can be used to increase the achievement of pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) targets.

METHODS

In a prospective randomized controlled study (Australian New Zealand Registry, ACTRN12615000086561), patients were subjected to TDM for 3 consecutive days. Dose was adjusted in the intervention group to achieve a free drug concentration above the MIC for 100% of the dose interval (100% fT>MIC), which was also the primary outcome measure. The secondary PK/PD target was 50% fT>MIC. Duration of fever and days to recovery from neutropenia were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled. Initially, patients received 4.5 g of piperacillin/tazobactam every 8 h or every 6 h along with gentamicin co-therapy in 30/32 (94%) patients. At the first TDM, 7/32 (22%) patients achieved 100% fT>MIC and 12/32 (38%) patients achieved 50% fT>MIC. Following dose adjustment, 11/16 (69%) of intervention patients versus 3/16 (19%) of control patients (P = 0.012) attained 100% fT>MIC, and 15/16 (94%) of intervention patients versus 5/16 (31%) of control patients (P = 0.001) achieved 50% fT>MIC. After the third TDM, the proportion of patients attaining 100% fT>MIC improved from a baseline 3/16 (19%) to 11/15 (73%) in the intervention group, while it declined from 4/16 (25%) to 1/15 (7%) in the control group. No difference was noted in the duration of fever and days to recovery from neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional doses of piperacillin/tazobactam may not offer adequate piperacillin exposure in febrile neutropenic patients. TDM provides useful feedback of dosing adequacy to guide dose optimization.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是描述发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的哌拉西林暴露情况,并确定治疗药物监测(TDM)是否可用于提高药代动力学(PK)/药效学(PD)目标的达成率。

方法

在一项前瞻性随机对照研究(澳大利亚新西兰注册中心,ACTRN12615000086561)中,患者连续3天接受TDM。在干预组中调整剂量,以使游离药物浓度在整个给药间隔期间高于最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的时间占比达到100%(100% fT>MIC),这也是主要结局指标。次要PK/PD目标是50% fT>MIC。记录发热持续时间和中性粒细胞减少症恢复天数。

结果

共纳入32例患者。最初,30/32(94%)的患者每8小时或每6小时接受4.5 g哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗,并联合庆大霉素治疗。在首次TDM时,7/32(22%)的患者达到100% fT>MIC,12/32(38%)的患者达到50% fT>MIC。调整剂量后,干预组11/16(69%)的患者达到100% fT>MIC,而对照组为3/16(19%)(P = 0.012);干预组15/16(94%)的患者达到50% fT>MIC,而对照组为5/16(31%)(P = 0.001)。在第三次TDM后,干预组达到100% fT>MIC的患者比例从基线时的3/16(19%)提高到11/15(73%),而对照组从4/16(25%)降至1/15(7%)。发热持续时间和中性粒细胞减少症恢复天数无差异。

结论

常规剂量的哌拉西林/他唑巴坦可能无法使发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者获得足够的哌拉西林暴露。TDM可为给药充足性提供有用反馈,以指导剂量优化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验