Baschera Dominik, Rad Hooman, Collopy Dermot, Zellweger René
Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, 6000, Australia.
University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 May 9;10:60. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0202-z.
The aim of the study was to evaluate predictors and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification (HO) in patients treated for acetabular fractures in a tertiary referral centre.
The study is a retrospective cohort study with a nested case-control study. All patients treated with internal fixation of acetabular fractures from January 2004 to October 2013. Ninety patients had postoperative imaging available at 6 and 12 months postoperatively and received no prophylaxis. Plain radiographs were used to grade HO. The Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) was used to compare outcomes between patients suffering from HO with patients who did not.
Sixteen patients (17.7%) suffered from HO. According to the Brooker classification, 5 had class I, 4 class II, 3 class III and 4 class IV HO. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) was the only significant risk factor for developing HO (odds ratio (OR) 8.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.693-43.753), p = 0.014). The HO rate in patients with an anterior (ilioinguinal) or posterior (Kocher-Langenbeck) surgical approach was 20% and 21% respectively, and the HO rate in patients with a combined approach was much lower at 11%. Neither fracture type nor gender nor age increased the risk of HO significantly. The outcome measured by HOOS was not significantly different between patients with HO and patients in the control group. Patients with HO Brooker class II-IV had slightly lower (effect estimate +4.25, 95% CI (-10.2 to +12.10), p = 0.220) HOOS compared to the majority of the control group.
A very low rate of HO was found compared to the HO rates described in other studies with similar patient cohorts who received prophylaxis. Based on our findings and the current literature, we do not recommend giving prophylaxis against HO to patients after internal fixation of acetabular fractures.
本研究旨在评估在一家三级转诊中心接受髋臼骨折治疗的患者发生异位骨化(HO)的预测因素及临床相关性。
本研究为一项回顾性队列研究,并嵌套了病例对照研究。纳入2004年1月至2013年10月期间所有接受髋臼骨折内固定治疗的患者。90例患者术后6个月和12个月有影像学资料且未接受预防措施。采用X线平片对HO进行分级。使用髋关节功能障碍和骨关节炎结果评分(HOOS)比较发生HO的患者与未发生HO的患者之间的结果。
16例患者(17.7%)发生HO。根据布鲁克分类法,5例为I级,4例为II级,3例为III级,4例为IV级HO。创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是发生HO的唯一显著危险因素(比值比(OR)8.6,95%置信区间(CI)(1.693 - 43.753),p = 0.014)。采用前路(髂腹股沟)或后路(科克伦 - 朗根贝克)手术入路的患者HO发生率分别为20%和21%,而采用联合入路的患者HO发生率低得多,为11%。骨折类型、性别和年龄均未显著增加HO的风险。HO患者与对照组患者通过HOOS测量的结果无显著差异。与大多数对照组患者相比,HO布鲁克II - IV级的患者HOOS略低(效应估计值 +4.25,95% CI(-10.2至 +12.10),p = 0.220)。
与其他对接受预防措施的类似患者队列进行研究描述的HO发生率相比,本研究发现的HO发生率非常低。基于我们的研究结果和当前文献,我们不建议对髋臼骨折内固定术后的患者进行HO预防。