Suppr超能文献

与传统心脏CT中的滤波反投影相比,混合迭代重建对阿加斯顿冠状动脉钙化积分的影响。

Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Comparison to Filtered Back Projection in Native Cardiac CT.

作者信息

Obmann V C, Klink T, Heverhagen J T, Stork A, Laqmani A, Adam G, Begemann P G C

机构信息

University Institute for Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital - University Hospital Bern, Switzerland.

Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Rofo. 2015 May;187(5):372-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1398850. Epub 2015 Apr 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the effects of hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) on coronary artery calcium (CAC) measurements using the Agatston score lead to changes in assignment of patients to cardiovascular risk groups compared to filtered back projection (FBP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

68 patients (mean age 61.5 years; 48 male; 20 female) underwent prospectively ECG-gated, non-enhanced, cardiac 256-MSCT for coronary calcium scoring. Scanning parameters were as follows: Tube voltage, 120 kV; Mean tube current time-product 63.67 mAs (50 - 150 mAs); collimation, 2 × 128 × 0.625 mm. Images were reconstructed with FBP and with HIR at all levels (L1 to L7). Two independent readers measured Agatston scores of all reconstructions and assigned patients to cardiovascular risk groups. Scores of HIR and FBP reconstructions were correlated (Spearman). Interobserver agreement and variability was assessed with ĸ-statistics and Bland-Altmann-Plots.

RESULTS

Agatston scores of HIR reconstructions were closely correlated with FBP reconstructions (L1, R = 0.9996; L2, R = 0.9995; L3, R = 0.9991; L4, R = 0.986; L5, R = 0.9986; L6, R = 0.9987; and L7, R = 0.9986). In comparison to FBP, HIR led to reduced Agatston scores between 97 % (L1) and 87.4 % (L7) of the FBP values. Using HIR iterations L1 - L3, all patients were assigned to identical risk groups as after FPB reconstruction. In 5.4 % of patients the risk group after HIR with the maximum iteration level was different from the group after FBP reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

There was an excellent correlation of Agatston scores after HIR and FBP with identical risk group assignment at levels 1 - 3 for all patients. Hence it appears that the application of HIR in routine calcium scoring does not entail any disadvantages. Thus, future studies are needed to demonstrate whether HIR is a reliable method for reducing radiation dose in coronary calcium scoring.

摘要

目的

研究与滤波反投影(FBP)相比,混合迭代重建(HIR)对使用阿加西评分法测量冠状动脉钙化(CAC)的影响是否会导致患者心血管风险分组的变化。

材料与方法

68例患者(平均年龄61.5岁;男性48例,女性20例)接受前瞻性心电图门控、非增强心脏256层螺旋CT冠状动脉钙化评分。扫描参数如下:管电压120 kV;平均管电流时间乘积63.67 mAs(50 - 150 mAs);准直,2×128×0.625 mm。图像在所有层面(L1至L7)使用FBP和HIR进行重建。两名独立阅片者测量所有重建图像的阿加西评分,并将患者分入心血管风险组。对HIR和FBP重建图像的评分进行相关性分析(Spearman法)。使用ĸ统计量和Bland-Altmann图评估观察者间的一致性和变异性。

结果

HIR重建图像的阿加西评分与FBP重建图像密切相关(L1,R = 0.9996;L2,R = 0.9995;L3,R = 0.9991;L4,R = 0.986;L5,R = 0.9986;L6,R = 0.9987;L7,R = 0.9986)。与FBP相比,HIR使阿加西评分降低至FBP值的97%(L1)至87.4%(L7)。使用HIR迭代L1 - L3时,所有患者被分入与FBP重建后相同的风险组。在5.4%的患者中,HIR最大迭代水平后的风险组与FBP重建后的不同。

结论

HIR和FBP后的阿加西评分具有良好的相关性,所有患者在1 - 3层面的风险分组相同。因此,HIR在常规钙化评分中的应用似乎没有任何弊端。因此,未来需要进行研究以证明HIR是否是一种可靠的降低冠状动脉钙化评分辐射剂量的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验