Okumura Yasuyuki, Tachimori Hisateru, Matsumoto Toshihiko, Nishi Daisuke
Research Department, Institute for Health Economics and Policy, Association for Health Economics Research and Social Insurance and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan,
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Aug;232(16):3101-9. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-3952-8. Epub 2015 May 12.
Little is known about psychotropic medication prescriptions prior to drug overdose.
We aimed to examine the possible associations between the risk of overdose and exposures to various psychotropic medications.
We conducted a matched case-control study of 3 groups of patients aged 12-74 years, using a large-scale health insurance claims database in Japan (population 1.2 million). A total of 351 cases with drug poisoning were compared with two control groups without overdose: 1755 patients with any treatment (general controls) and those with depression (high-risk controls). Current, past, and nonusers were patients most recently exposed to psychotropic medications ≤ 90 days, 91-180 days, and ≥ 180 days before the index date.
Current sedative-hypnotic use was associated with an increased odds of overdose relative to general control nonusers (odds ratio [OR], 21.5; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 9.7-47.8) and high-risk control nonusers (OR, 2.6; 95 % CI, 1.9-3.5). In the comparison of cases and high-risk controls, the ORs for overdose were higher among excessive dosage users than among usual dosage users (OR, 4.3; 95 % CI, 3.0-6.1), among barbiturate users than among benzodiazepine/Z-drug only users (OR, 4.5; 95 % CI, 2.3-8.7), and among multiple provider episodes than among single provider episodes (OR, 4.4; 95 % CI, 1.7-11.0). Psychiatrists prescribed more than 77 % of potentially questionable prescriptions.
These results highlight the need for psychiatrists to monitor prescribed medications and balance the benefits and risks of pharmacological treatments.
关于药物过量之前的精神药物处方情况,人们了解甚少。
我们旨在研究药物过量风险与接触各种精神药物之间的可能关联。
我们利用日本一个大规模医疗保险理赔数据库(人口120万),对3组年龄在12 - 74岁的患者进行了匹配病例对照研究。总共351例药物中毒病例与两个无药物过量的对照组进行比较:1755例接受任何治疗的患者(一般对照组)和患有抑郁症的患者(高危对照组)。当前使用者、过去使用者和非使用者分别是在索引日期前最近90天内、91 - 180天内以及180天以上接触精神药物的患者。
与一般对照非使用者(优势比[OR],21.5;95%置信区间[CI],9.7 - 47.8)和高危对照非使用者(OR,2.6;95% CI,1.9 - 3.5)相比,当前使用镇静催眠药与药物过量几率增加相关。在病例与高危对照的比较中,过量用药使用者的药物过量OR高于常规用药使用者(OR,4.3;95% CI,3.0 - 6.1),巴比妥类药物使用者高于仅使用苯二氮䓬类/ Z类药物使用者(OR,4.5;95% CI,2.3 - 8.7),多次就诊者高于单次就诊者(OR,4.4;95% CI,1.7 - 11.0)。精神科医生开出了超过77%的潜在可疑处方。
这些结果凸显了精神科医生监测所开药物并权衡药物治疗利弊的必要性。