Singh Jasvinder A, Akhras Kasem S, Shiozawa Aki
Medicine Service and Center for Surgical Medical Acute care Research and Transitions (C-SMART), Birmingham VA Medical Center, 700 South 19th Street, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
Department of Medicine at School of Medicine, University of Alabama, 1670 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 May 12;17(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0624-3.
To assess the comparative effectiveness of febuxostat and allopurinol in reducing serum urate (sUA) levels in a real-world U.S. managed care setting.
This retrospective study utilized 2009 to 2012 medical and pharmacy claims and laboratory data from a large U.S. commercial and Medicare Advantage health plan. Study patients had at least one medical claim with a diagnosis of gout, at least one filled prescription for febuxostat or allopurinol and at least one sUA measurement post-index prescription. Reduction in sUA was examined using propensity score-matched cohorts, matched on patient demographics (gender, age), baseline sUA, comorbidities, geographic region and insurance type.
The study sample included 2,015 patients taking febuxostat and 14,025 taking allopurinol. At baseline, febuxostat users had a higher Quan-Charlson comorbidity score (0.78 vs. 0.53; P <0.001), but similar age and gender distribution. Mean (standard deviation (SD)) sUA level following propensity score matching among treatment-naïve febuxostat vs. allopurinol users (n = 873 each) were: pre-index sUA, 8.86 (SD, 1.79) vs. 8.72 (SD, 1.63; P = 0.20); and post-index sUA, 6.53 (SD, 2.01) vs. 6.71 (SD, 1.70; P = 0.04), respectively. A higher proportion of febuxostat users attained sUA goals of <6.0 mg/dl (56.9% vs. 44.8%; P <0.001) and <5.0 mg/dl (35.5% vs. 19.2%; P <0.001), respectively. Time to achieve sUA goals of <6.0 mg/dl (346 vs. 397 days; P <0.001) and <5.0 mg/dl was shorter in febuxostat vs. allopurinol users (431 vs. 478 days; P <0.001), respectively. Similar observations were made for overall propensity score-matched cohorts that included both treatment-naïve and current users (n = 1,932 each).
Febuxostat was more effective than allopurinol at the currently used doses (40 mg/day for febuxostat in 83% users and 300 mg/day or lower for allopurinol in 97% users) in lowering sUA in gout patients as demonstrated by post-index mean sUA level, the likelihood of and the time to achieving sUA goals.
评估非布司他和别嘌醇在美国实际管理式医疗环境中降低血清尿酸(sUA)水平的相对疗效。
这项回顾性研究利用了2009年至2012年来自美国一家大型商业和医疗保险优势健康计划的医疗和药房索赔以及实验室数据。研究患者至少有一项诊断为痛风的医疗索赔、至少一张非布司他或别嘌醇的已填充处方以及至少一次索引处方后的sUA测量值。使用倾向评分匹配队列来检查sUA的降低情况,匹配因素包括患者人口统计学特征(性别、年龄)、基线sUA、合并症、地理区域和保险类型。
研究样本包括2015名服用非布司他的患者和14025名服用别嘌醇的患者。在基线时,非布司他使用者的全查尔森合并症评分较高(0.78对0.53;P<0.001),但年龄和性别分布相似。在初治非布司他使用者与别嘌醇使用者(每组n = 873)中,倾向评分匹配后的平均(标准差(SD))sUA水平分别为:索引前sUA,8.86(SD,1.79)对8.72(SD,1.63;P = 0.20);索引后sUA,6.53(SD,2.01)对6.71(SD,1.70;P = 0.04)。非布司他使用者达到sUA目标<6.0mg/dl(56.9%对44.8%;P<0.001)和<5.0mg/dl(35.5%对19.2%;P<0.001)的比例更高。非布司他使用者达到sUA目标<6.0mg/dl(346天对397天;P<0.001)和<5.0mg/dl的时间比别嘌醇使用者短(431天对478天;P<0.001)。对于包括初治和现用者的总体倾向评分匹配队列(每组n = 1932)也有类似观察结果。
如索引后平均sUA水平、达到sUA目标的可能性和时间所示,在当前使用的剂量下(83%的使用者非布司他为40mg/天,97%的使用者别嘌醇为300mg/天或更低),非布司他在降低痛风患者的sUA方面比别嘌醇更有效。