Tian Panwen, Shen Yongchun, Wang Ye, Wan Chun, Feng Mei, Zhu Jing, Yang Ting, Chen Lei, Wen Fuqiang
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Division of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of China, Chengdu 610041, China.
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Division of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of China, Chengdu 610041, China
Biosci Rep. 2015 May 12;35(4):e00232. doi: 10.1042/BSR20140186.
The diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (SNPT) remains a clinical challenge. Many studies suggest that nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) plays a role in diagnosing SNPT, but with considerable varying results. The current study aimed to summarize the overall diagnostic accuracy of NAATs assay on BALF for SNPT. A systematic literature search was performed and data were retrieved. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the overall diagnostic performance. All the statistical analysis was performed by using STATA 12.0 and Meta-DiSc 1.4 software. A total of nine studies with 1214 subjects were included this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR were 0.54 [95% CI (confidence interval): 0.48-0.59], 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98), 12.13 (95% CI: 8.23-17.88), 0.36 (95% CI: 0.23-0.56) and 44.71 (95% CI: 22.30-89.63) respectively. The AUC was 0.96. Estimated positive and negative post-probability values for a SNPT prevalence of 20% were 82% and 7% respectively. No publication bias was identified. Current available evidence indicated that NAATs on BALF may play a role in diagnosing SNPT, whereas the results should be interpreted in parallel with clinical information of patients and the results of traditional tests. Further studies should be performed to confirm our findings.
涂片阴性肺结核(SNPT)的诊断仍然是一项临床挑战。许多研究表明,支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)的核酸扩增检测(NAATs)在SNPT诊断中发挥作用,但结果差异很大。本研究旨在总结BALF的NAATs检测对SNPT的总体诊断准确性。进行了系统的文献检索并获取数据。计算合并敏感度、特异度、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)和诊断比值比(DOR)。采用汇总的受试者工作特征曲线及曲线下面积(AUC)评估总体诊断性能。所有统计分析均使用STATA 12.0和Meta-DiSc 1.4软件进行。本荟萃分析共纳入9项研究,涉及1214名受试者。合并敏感度、特异度、PLR、NLR和DOR分别为0.54 [95%可信区间(CI):0.48 - 0.59]、0.97(95% CI:0.95 - 0.98)、12.13(95% CI:8.23 - 17.88)、0.36(95% CI:0.23 - 0.56)和44.71(95% CI:22.30 - 89.63)。AUC为0.96。对于SNPT患病率为20%的情况,估计的阳性和阴性验后概率值分别为82%和7%。未发现发表偏倚。现有证据表明,BALF的NAATs可能在SNPT诊断中发挥作用,但其结果应结合患者的临床信息和传统检测结果进行解读。应开展进一步研究以证实我们的发现。