Suppr超能文献

2型糖尿病患者在二甲双胍基础上加用二线口服抗糖尿病药物相关的心血管风险:一项全国性队列研究

Cardiovascular risks associated with second-line oral antidiabetic agents added to metformin in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a nationwide cohort study.

作者信息

Chang Y-C, Chuang L-M, Lin J-W, Chen S-T, Lai M-S, Chang C-H

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2015 Nov;32(11):1460-9. doi: 10.1111/dme.12800. Epub 2015 May 28.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the cardiovascular risks associated with second-line oral antidiabetic agents added to initial metformin therapy in a large nationwide observational study.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance database. A total of 36 118 users of different add-on oral antidiabetic agents (sulphonylureas, glinides, pioglitazone, α-glucosidase inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors) after initial metformin therapy were included in the analysis. The reference group was sulphonylureas added to metformin, the most commonly used combination regimen. The main outcomes of interest were hospitalizations for any cardiovascular event including acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure and ischaemic stroke. In the main analysis, all patients were followed within their initiation groups until the study end, disregarding any changes in treatment status over time.

RESULTS

In intention-to-treat analyses, there was no difference in the risk of any cardiovascular event among the add-on combination treatment groups, but significantly lower risks of acute myocardial infarction were found for the glinides plus metformin treatment group (crude hazard ratio 0.52, adjusted hazard ratio 0.39; 95% CI 0.20-0.75) and for the α-glucosidase inhibitors plus metformin treatment group (crude hazard ratio 0.63, adjusted hazard ratio 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.95). No difference in risk of congestive heart failure or ischaemic stroke risk was found among the combination treatment groups. In secondary as-treated analyses, similar but less significant associations were found as compared with the primary intention-to-treat analyses for all treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

There were no differences in overall cardiovascular risks among several add-on second-line oral antidiabetic agents; however, glinide plus metformin and α-glucosidase inhibitors plus metformin combination therapies might be associated with lower risks of acute myocardial infarction.

摘要

目的

在一项大规模全国性观察性研究中,比较在初始二甲双胍治疗基础上加用二线口服抗糖尿病药物所带来的心血管风险。

方法

我们利用台湾国民健康保险数据库进行了一项全国性回顾性队列研究。初始二甲双胍治疗后加用不同口服抗糖尿病药物(磺脲类、格列奈类、吡格列酮、α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂和二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂)的36118名使用者被纳入分析。参照组为二甲双胍加磺脲类药物,这是最常用的联合治疗方案。主要关注的结局是因任何心血管事件住院,包括急性心肌梗死、充血性心力衰竭和缺血性中风。在主要分析中,所有患者在其初始治疗组内进行随访直至研究结束,不考虑治疗状态随时间的任何变化。

结果

在意向性分析中,联合治疗组之间任何心血管事件的风险没有差异,但格列奈类加二甲双胍治疗组(粗风险比0.52,调整后风险比0.39;95%可信区间0.20 - 0.75)和α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂加二甲双胍治疗组(粗风险比0.63,调整后风险比0.54;95%可信区间0.31 - 0.95)的急性心肌梗死风险显著较低。联合治疗组之间充血性心力衰竭风险或缺血性中风风险没有差异。在二次实际治疗分析中,与所有治疗组的主要意向性分析相比,发现了相似但不太显著的关联。

结论

几种加用的二线口服抗糖尿病药物在总体心血管风险上没有差异;然而,格列奈类加二甲双胍和α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂加二甲双胍联合治疗可能与较低的急性心肌梗死风险相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验