Sribnick Eric, Sarda Samir, Moore Mike, Capasse Meredith, Tubbs R Shane, Wrubel David, Chern Joshua J
‡Pediatric Neurosurgery Associates, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia; §Neurosurgery Department, Emory University, Atlanta Georgia; ¶Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital, Birmingham, Alabama.
Neurosurgery. 2015 Jun;76(6):695-8; discussion 699. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000708.
Patients with cerebrospinal fluid shunts frequently present to the emergency department (ED) with suspected shunt malfunction. The outcome of those patients who were discharged from ED when shunt malfunction was deemed unlikely has not been previously documented.
To demonstrate there is no increase in severity or likelihood of harm for patients who are discharged directly from the ED after adequate evaluation, as compared to patients who were selected for inpatient hospitalization.
The report screens 3080 ED visits between 2010 and 2013 made by patients with shunted hydrocephalus. ED visits preceded by another ED visit or neurosurgical procedures within 60 days were excluded. ED visits for reasons unrelated to shunt function were excluded, and 1943 visits met the inclusion criteria. Final dispositions from the ED included home (n = 1176), admission to neurosurgery service (n = 550), and admission to other services (n = 217). Subsequent events within 30 days, including ED visits and elective and nonelective shunt-related surgery, were reviewed.
The clinical characteristics of the 3 groups were similar. Of patients discharged home from the ED, 19.0% returned to ED, and 4.5% required shunt-related surgeries. Of the patients admitted for observation, 18.7% returned to ED and 14.2% required shunt-related surgery. Of the patients admitted to other hospital services, 19.6% patients returned to the ED, with 2.0% requiring surgical intervention. There were no shunt-related mortalities in any of the 3 groups.
Children with cerebrospinal fluid shunts are often evaluated in the ED. Discharge from the ED, when suspicion for shunt malfunction is low, is an appropriate practice.
脑脊液分流术患者常因疑似分流器故障而前往急诊科(ED)就诊。此前尚无关于那些在被认为分流器故障可能性不大时从急诊科出院的患者的结局记录。
证明与被选入住院治疗的患者相比,经过充分评估后直接从急诊科出院的患者在病情严重程度或伤害可能性方面没有增加。
该报告筛选了2010年至2013年间脑积水分流术患者的3080次急诊科就诊记录。排除在60天内有另一次急诊科就诊或神经外科手术史的就诊记录。排除与分流器功能无关原因的就诊记录,1943次就诊符合纳入标准。急诊科的最终处置包括回家(n = 1176)、入住神经外科病房(n = 550)和入住其他科室(n = 217)。回顾了30天内的后续事件,包括急诊科就诊以及择期和非择期分流器相关手术。
三组患者的临床特征相似。从急诊科出院回家的患者中,19.0%返回急诊科,4.5%需要进行分流器相关手术。入院观察的患者中,18.7%返回急诊科,14.2%需要进行分流器相关手术。入住其他医院科室的患者中,19.6%返回急诊科,2.0%需要手术干预。三组中均无分流器相关死亡病例。
脑脊液分流术患儿常于急诊科接受评估。当分流器故障怀疑度较低时,从急诊科出院是一种恰当的做法。