Stefanidis Dimitrios, Ingram Katherine M, Williams Kristy H, Bencken Crystal L, Swiderski Dawn
Carolinas Simulation Center, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, North Carolina; Department of Surgery, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Carolinas Simulation Center, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, North Carolina.
J Surg Educ. 2015 Sep-Oct;72(5):823-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.03.016. Epub 2015 May 19.
Interdisciplinary team training in a simulation center recreates clinical team interactions and holds promise in improving teamwork of clinicians by breaking down educational silos. The objective of our study was to assess the appropriateness of interdisciplinary training with general surgery residents and nursing students.
Over 2 consecutive academic years (2012-2013 and 2013-2014), general surgery residents participated in interdisciplinary team-training simulation-based sessions with senior nursing students. Scenario objectives included demonstration of appropriate teamwork and communication, and clinical decision making; sessions incorporated interdisciplinary debriefing of the scenarios. Participants were asked to assess their team-training experience and the appropriateness of their team-training partner. Responses were compared.
A total of 16 team-training sessions were conducted during the study period. Overall, 12 surgery residents (67%) and 44 nursing students (63%) who had participated in at least 1 session responded to the survey. Although both residents and nursing students indicated that the knowledge and team skills acquired during these sessions were useful to them in clinical practice (73% vs 86%, respectively; p = not significant), residents rated their educational value lower (3.3 vs 4.3 on a 5-point scale, respectively; p < 0.01) and only 18% of the residents felt that these sessions should be continued compared with 90% of nursing students (p < 0.05). Most useful components of the sessions were participation in the scenario (73%) and debriefing (54%) for residents and for the nursing students, debriefing (91%), observation of others (68%), and interaction with resident physicians (66%) ranked highest; 48% of student nurses preferred residents as team-training partners whereas 100% residents preferred practicing nurses and 0% with nursing students owing to their limited clinical experience.
Interdisciplinary team training and debriefing of surgery residents with nursing students is feasible and highly valued by nursing students. Nevertheless, our experience indicates that residents do not prefer nursing students as team-training partners owing to their limited clinical experience and would rather train with experienced nurses.
在模拟中心进行跨学科团队培训可重现临床团队互动,有望通过打破教育壁垒来提高临床医生的团队协作能力。我们研究的目的是评估普通外科住院医师与护理专业学生进行跨学科培训的适宜性。
在连续两个学年(2012 - 2013年和2013 - 2014年)中,普通外科住院医师与高年级护理专业学生参加了基于模拟的跨学科团队培训课程。情景目标包括展示恰当的团队协作与沟通以及临床决策;课程包含对情景的跨学科总结汇报。参与者被要求评估他们的团队培训经历以及团队培训伙伴的适宜性。对回答进行了比较。
在研究期间共开展了16次团队培训课程。总体而言,12名参加过至少1次课程的外科住院医师(67%)和44名护理专业学生(63%)对调查做出了回应。尽管住院医师和护理专业学生均表示在这些课程中获得的知识和团队技能在临床实践中对他们有用(分别为73%和86%;p值无统计学意义),但住院医师对其教育价值的评价较低(在5分制中分别为3.3分和4.3分;p < 0.01),只有18%的住院医师认为这些课程应继续开展,而护理专业学生中这一比例为90%(p < 0.05)。对住院医师和护理专业学生来说,课程最有用的部分,住院医师是参与情景(73%)和总结汇报(54%),护理专业学生则是总结汇报(91%)、观察他人(68%)以及与住院医师互动(66%)排名最高;48%的护理专业学生更喜欢住院医师作为团队培训伙伴,而100%的住院医师因护理专业学生临床经验有限而更喜欢执业护士,选择护理专业学生的比例为0%。
普通外科住院医师与护理专业学生进行跨学科团队培训和总结汇报是可行的,且受到护理专业学生的高度重视。然而,我们的经验表明,由于护理专业学生临床经验有限,住院医师不倾向于选择他们作为团队培训伙伴,而是更愿意与经验丰富的护士一起培训。