Wirtz Andrea L, Peryshkina Alena, Mogilniy Vladimir, Beyrer Chris, Decker Michele R
Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, USA; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Public Health and Human Rights, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, USA.
AIDS Infoshare, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Aug;26(8):755-63. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
Female sex workers (FSW) and people who inject drugs (PWID) are at high risk for HIV infection, with FSW-PWID at even greater risk. HIV-related research often focuses on the primary mode of transmission - sexual or parenteral transmission for FSW and PWID, respectively - with less known on how sex work and injection drug use (IDU) are collectively associated with the risk environment experienced by sex workers. We investigated this relationship among FSW in three Russian cities.
In 2011, FSWs (N=754) in Tomsk, Krasnoyarsk, and Kazan were recruited via respondent-driven sampling and completed a survey and rapid HIV screening. Multivariable models evaluated the role of injection history (classified as active: last 6 months, former: prior to last 6 months, and never) with a set of sexual and structural HIV risk outcomes.
IDU was common: 11% actively injected drugs and 11% were former injectors. HIV infection was most prevalent among active injectors (AOR: 6.7; 95% CI: 2.4-18.9) and former injectors (AOR:4.5; 95%CI: 1.7-11.6), compared to non-injectors. Some 6-8% of non-injecting FSWs reported recent physical or sexual client violence and 23% police extortion. Compared to these non-injectors, active injecting was associated with unprotected anal sex (AOR: 2.8, 95%CI: 1.2-6.4), client violence (AOR: 7.3, 95%CI: 2.1-24.7), and police extortion (AOR: 3.0 95%CI: 1.5-5.9%). Self-reported sexual and structural risk outcomes were also more prevalent among active compared to former injectors; however, few differences existed between former and non-injectors.
FSW experience sexual, structural, and HIV risk outcomes and these risks are amplified for actively injecting FSWs. FSW who stopped injecting drugs demonstrated risk profiles closer to those of sex workers who had no history of injection. HIV prevention programs and outreach can provide opportunities to include harm reduction interventions and linkage to treatment for FSW to move FSWs towards lower risk environments.
女性性工作者(FSW)和注射吸毒者(PWID)感染艾滋病毒的风险很高,女性性工作者兼注射吸毒者的风险更高。与艾滋病毒相关的研究通常侧重于主要传播方式——女性性工作者为性传播,注射吸毒者为非肠道传播,而对于性工作和注射吸毒如何共同与性工作者所经历的风险环境相关联则知之甚少。我们调查了俄罗斯三个城市的女性性工作者之间的这种关系。
2011年,通过应答驱动抽样招募了托木斯克、克拉斯诺亚尔斯克和喀山的女性性工作者(N = 754),她们完成了一项调查和快速艾滋病毒筛查。多变量模型评估了注射史(分为活跃:过去6个月内,既往:过去6个月之前,从未)在一系列性传播和结构性艾滋病毒风险结果中的作用。
注射吸毒很常见:11%的人目前仍在注射毒品,11%的人曾经注射过。与未注射者相比,艾滋病毒感染在目前仍在注射毒品者中最为普遍(调整后比值比:6.7;95%置信区间:2.4 - 18.9),在曾经注射过毒品者中也较为普遍(调整后比值比:4.5;95%置信区间:1.7 - 11.6)。约6 - 8%未注射毒品的女性性工作者报告近期遭受过嫖客的身体暴力或性暴力,23%报告遭受过警察敲诈勒索。与这些未注射者相比,目前仍在注射毒品与无保护肛交(调整后比值比:2.8,95%置信区间:1.2 - 6.4)、嫖客暴力(调整后比值比:7.3,95%置信区间:2.1 - 24.7)以及警察敲诈勒索(调整后比值比:3.0,95%置信区间:1.5 - 5.9%)相关。自我报告的性传播和结构性风险结果在目前仍在注射毒品者中也比曾经注射过毒品者更为普遍;然而,曾经注射过毒品者与未注射者之间几乎没有差异。
女性性工作者面临性传播、结构性和艾滋病毒风险结果,而对于目前仍在注射毒品的女性性工作者,这些风险会加剧。停止注射毒品的女性性工作者所表现出的风险特征更接近那些没有注射史的性工作者。艾滋病毒预防项目和外展服务可以提供机会,纳入减少伤害干预措施,并为女性性工作者提供治疗联系,以使她们转向风险较低的环境。