Dundon Neil M, Dockree Suvi P, Buckley Vanessa, Merriman Niamh, Carton Mary, Clarke Sarah, Roche Richard A P, Lalor Edmund C, Robertson Ian H, Dockree Paul M
Headway Ireland, Blackhall Place, Dublin 7, Ireland; Università di Bologna, Dipartimento di Psichologia, Viale Berti Pichat, 5, Bologna, Italy.
Headway Ireland, Blackhall Place, Dublin 7, Ireland; National Rehabilitation Hospital, Dun Laoghaire, Ireland.
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Aug;75:74-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 May 21.
Patients who suffer traumatic brain injury frequently report difficulty concentrating on tasks and completing routine activities in noisy and distracting environments. Such impairments can have long-term negative psychosocial consequences. A cognitive control function that may underlie this impairment is the capacity to select a goal-relevant signal for further processing while safeguarding it from irrelevant noise. A paradigmatic investigation of this problem was undertaken using a dichotic listening task (study 1) in which comprehension of a stream of speech to one ear was measured in the context of increasing interference from a second stream of irrelevant speech to the other ear. Controls showed an initial decline in performance in the presence of competing speech but thereafter showed adaptation to increasing audibility of irrelevant speech, even at the highest levels of noise. By contrast, patients showed linear decline in performance with increasing noise. Subsequently attempts were made to ameliorate this deficit (study 2) using a cognitive training procedure based on attention process training (APT) that included graded exposure to irrelevant noise over the course of training. Patients were assigned to adaptive and non-adaptive training schedules or to a no-training control group. Results showed that both types of training drove improvements in the dichotic listening and in naturalistic tasks of performance in noise. Improvements were also seen on measures of selective attention in the visual domain suggesting transfer of training. We also observed augmentation of event-related potentials (ERPs) linked to target processing (P3b) but no change in ERPs evoked by distractor stimuli (P3a) suggesting that training heightened tuning of target signals, as opposed to gating irrelevant noise. No changes in any of the above measures were observed in a no-training control group. Together these findings present an ecologically valid approach to measure selective attention difficulties after brain injury, and provide a means to ameliorate these deficits.
遭受创伤性脑损伤的患者经常报告,在嘈杂和干扰的环境中难以集中精力完成任务和进行日常活动。这种损伤可能会产生长期负面的心理社会后果。一种可能是这种损伤基础的认知控制功能,是在保护目标相关信号免受无关噪声干扰的同时,选择该信号进行进一步处理的能力。针对这个问题进行了一项典型研究(研究1),采用了双耳分听任务,即在来自另一只耳朵的无关语音流干扰增加的情况下,测量对一只耳朵语音流的理解。对照组在存在竞争性语音时表现出最初的下降,但此后即使在最高噪声水平下,也能适应无关语音可听度的增加。相比之下,患者的表现随着噪声增加呈线性下降。随后尝试(研究2)使用基于注意力过程训练(APT)的认知训练程序来改善这种缺陷,该程序在训练过程中包括逐步接触无关噪声。患者被分配到适应性和非适应性训练计划组或无训练对照组。结果表明,两种类型的训练都促进了双耳分听和在噪声环境中自然任务表现的改善。在视觉领域的选择性注意测量中也观察到了改善,表明训练产生了迁移效果。我们还观察到与目标处理相关的事件相关电位(ERP)增强(P3b),但分心刺激诱发的ERP(P3a)没有变化,这表明训练增强了目标信号的调谐,而不是抑制无关噪声。在无训练对照组中,上述任何测量指标均未观察到变化。这些研究结果共同提出了一种生态有效的方法来测量脑损伤后选择性注意困难,并提供了改善这些缺陷的手段。