Kulkarni Veena S
Department of Criminology, Sociology and Geography, Arkansas State University, PO Box 2410, State University, AR 72467, United States.
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Jul;52:539-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
Previous research on understanding race-ethnic differentials in employment and economic contributions by married women has primarily focused on Blacks, Hispanics, or Whites. This study investigates variations in wives' earning contributions as measured by wives earnings as a proportion of total annual household earnings among six Asian groups, Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese relative to native born non-Hispanic White. I disaggregate the six Asian groups by their ethnicity and nativity status. Using pooled data from 2009-2011 American Community Survey, the findings show significance of human capital, hours of paid labor market engagement and nativity status. There is strong and negative association between husbands' human capital and labor supply with wives' earning contributions suggesting near universality of male-breadwinner status. Notwithstanding the commonalities, there is significant intergroup diversity. While foreign born and native born Filipina wives despite their spouses' reasonably high human capital and work hours, contribute one of the highest shares, the same cannot be said for the Asian Indians and Japanese. For foreign born Asian Indian and to some extent Japanese women, their high human capital is not translated to high earning contribution after controlling for husband's human capital. Further, nativity status impacts groups differentially. Native born Vietnamese wives contribute the greatest. Overall, the findings underscore the relevance of employing multiple conceptual frameworks in understanding earning contributions of foreign and native born Asian wives belonging to the six Asian groups, Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese.
以往关于理解已婚女性在就业和经济贡献方面的种族差异的研究主要集中在黑人、西班牙裔或白人身上。本研究调查了六个亚洲群体(印度裔、华裔、菲律宾裔、日裔、韩裔和越南裔)妻子的收入贡献差异,以妻子的收入占家庭年度总收入的比例来衡量,相对于本土出生的非西班牙裔白人。我按种族和出生身份对这六个亚洲群体进行了细分。利用2009 - 2011年美国社区调查的汇总数据,研究结果显示了人力资本、有偿劳动力市场参与时长和出生身份的重要性。丈夫的人力资本和劳动力供给与妻子的收入贡献之间存在强烈的负相关,这表明男性养家糊口的地位几乎具有普遍性。尽管存在共性,但群体间仍存在显著差异。虽然外国出生和本土出生的菲律宾裔妻子,尽管其配偶的人力资本和工作时长较高,但她们的贡献份额却是最高的之一,而印度裔和日裔则并非如此。对于外国出生的印度裔女性以及在一定程度上的日裔女性,在控制了丈夫的人力资本后,她们的高人力资本并未转化为高收入贡献。此外,出生身份对不同群体的影响也不同。本土出生的越南裔妻子贡献最大。总体而言,研究结果强调了采用多种概念框架来理解属于六个亚洲群体(印度裔、华裔、菲律宾裔、日裔、韩裔和越南裔)的外国出生和本土出生的亚洲妻子的收入贡献的相关性。