DiNardo Courtney D, Ravandi Farhad, Agresta Sam, Konopleva Marina, Takahashi Koichi, Kadia Tapan, Routbort Mark, Patel Keyur P, Pierce Sherry, Garcia-Manero Guillermo, Cortes Jorge, Kantarjian Hagop
Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Agios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Am J Hematol. 2015 Aug;90(8):732-6. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24072.
The pathophysiology of IDH mutations in tumorigenesis is increasingly described, yet the prognostic significance of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in AML remains controversial. The primary objective of this study was to define the natural history and prognosis of patients with AML and IDH1 or IDH2 mutations and provide historical survival expectations. A total of 826 patients treated from 2010 to 2014 at a single institution were evaluated, including 167 patients (20%) with AML and IDH1 or IDH2 mutations. Median age was 62 years (range 18-92). There were 59 IDH1-R132, 83 IDH2-R140, and 23 IDH2-R172 mutations. Clinicopathologic characteristics associated with IDH-mutations included older age, less frequent therapy-related status, and increased incidence of intermediate-risk cytogenetics, FLT3-ITD mutations, and NPM1 mutations. Remission rates (CR/CRi) by AML treatment status were: induction, 68%; Salvage-1 (S1), 42%; and Salvage-2 and beyond (S2+), 27%. No difference in response was identified by IDH mutation status. Similarly, overall survival (OS) was not dependent on IDH status within any cohort. The median OS was 15.4 months in induction, 8.7 months in S1, and 4.8 months in S2+. This analysis defines the clinical outcome associated with IDH-mutations in both the front-line and salvage AML treatment settings, and confirms that response rate and OS for both IDH-mutated and IDH wild-type AML patients is comparable. This provides contemporary data to be used for comparison with results of novel investigational (e.g., selective IDH inhibitor) strategies.
肿瘤发生过程中异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)突变的病理生理学得到了越来越多的描述,但IDH1和IDH2突变在急性髓系白血病(AML)中的预后意义仍存在争议。本研究的主要目的是明确AML伴IDH1或IDH2突变患者的自然病程和预后,并提供生存预期的历史数据。对2010年至2014年在单一机构接受治疗的826例患者进行了评估,其中包括167例(20%)AML伴IDH1或IDH2突变的患者。中位年龄为62岁(范围18 - 92岁)。有59例IDH1 - R132突变、83例IDH2 - R140突变和23例IDH2 - R172突变。与IDH突变相关的临床病理特征包括年龄较大、治疗相关状态较少见、中危细胞遗传学、FLT3 - ITD突变和NPM1突变的发生率增加。根据AML治疗状态的缓解率(完全缓解/血液学不完全缓解)为:诱导缓解,68%;挽救治疗1(S1),42%;挽救治疗2及以后(S2 +),27%。未发现IDH突变状态与缓解反应存在差异。同样,在任何队列中总生存期(OS)均不依赖于IDH状态。诱导缓解时的中位OS为15.4个月,S1时为8.7个月,S2 +时为4.8个月。该分析明确了一线和挽救性AML治疗环境中与IDH突变相关的临床结局,并证实IDH突变型和IDH野生型AML患者的缓解率和OS具有可比性。这提供了当代数据,可用于与新型研究策略(如选择性IDH抑制剂)的结果进行比较。