Suppr超能文献

女性盆腔医学与重建外科的实践模式:国际尿控学会会员调查

Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery practice patterns: IUGA member survey.

作者信息

Ghoniem Gamal, Hammett Jessica

机构信息

Department of Urology, Division of Female Urology, Pelvic Reconstruction Surgery and Voiding Dysfunction, University of California, Irvine 333 City Blvd. West, Ste 2100, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Oct;26(10):1489-94. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2734-5. Epub 2015 May 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study is to describe the current practice patterns of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) members regarding the diagnosis, evaluation, and surgical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

A 30-item internet-based survey was sent to IUGA members. Response to the survey was voluntary, and subjects answered questions regarding demographics, the evaluation of POP and SUI, including urodynamics (UDS) testing, preferred management of POP and SUI, and the application of mesh in reconstructive surgery.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty-four IUGA members responded to the survey; most of the responses were from Europe (40 %) and North America (23 %). After the FDA safety communication regarding serious complications of using transvaginal mesh, 45 % of responders reported decreased use of mesh, while 31 % reported that it had no effect or that they did not use mesh for transvaginal prolapse (23.6 %). Regarding the evaluation and treatment of SUI, 51 % of responders would perform urodynamics (UDS) before surgical correction of uncomplicated SUI and 78.5 % of responders would perform UDS if no urine leakage was demonstrated on examination. The preferred method of treatment for SUI is midurethral sling (MUS), regardless of prior treatments (65.1 %), concomitant surgeries (74.5 %), or examination findings (50.8-92.6 %). Regarding POP repair, the preferred approach for apical (61 %) and posterior (99.4 %) prolapse repair is vaginal.

CONCLUSIONS

Most respondents use a vaginal approach for POP surgery. The FDA safety communication regarding serious complications related to the use of transvaginal mesh for prolapse surgery led to a global decrease in the employment of mesh for POP. Synthetic midurethral slings are predominant in the current treatment of SUI. Despite new recommendations, many responders still perform UDS for uncomplicated SUI.

摘要

引言与假设

本研究旨在描述国际尿控协会(IUGA)成员在压力性尿失禁(SUI)和盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的诊断、评估及手术管理方面的当前实践模式。

方法

向IUGA成员发送了一份包含30个项目的基于网络的调查问卷。调查回复是自愿的,受试者回答了有关人口统计学、POP和SUI的评估(包括尿动力学[UDS]测试)、POP和SUI的首选管理方法以及网片在重建手术中的应用等问题。

结果

334名IUGA成员回复了调查;大多数回复来自欧洲(40%)和北美(23%)。在美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)发布关于使用经阴道网片的严重并发症的安全通报后,45%的回复者报告网片使用减少,而31%报告无影响或他们未将网片用于经阴道脱垂(23.6%)。关于SUI的评估和治疗,51%的回复者会在对单纯性SUI进行手术矫正前进行尿动力学(UDS)检查,78.5%的回复者在检查未发现尿液泄漏时会进行UDS检查。无论先前治疗情况(65.1%)、同期手术情况(74.5%)或检查结果(50.8 - 92.6%)如何,SUI的首选治疗方法是中段尿道吊带术(MUS)。关于POP修复,顶端(61%)和后壁(99.4%)脱垂修复的首选方法是经阴道途径。

结论

大多数受访者在POP手术中采用经阴道途径。FDA关于经阴道网片用于脱垂手术相关严重并发症的安全通报导致全球范围内POP手术中网片使用量减少。合成中段尿道吊带在当前SUI治疗中占主导地位。尽管有新的建议,但许多回复者仍对单纯性SUI进行UDS检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验