Ghasia Fatema F, Shaikh Aasef G, Jacobs Jonathan, Walker Mark F
Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States 2Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States 3Daroff-DelOsso Ocular Motility Laboratory, Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cle.
Daroff-DelOsso Ocular Motility Laboratory, Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States 4Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 May;56(5):2855-66. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-16371.
Pattern strabismus describes vertically incomitant horizontal strabismus. Conventional theories emphasized the role of orbital etiologies, such as abnormal fundus torsion and misaligned orbital pulleys as a cause of the pattern strabismus. Experiments in animal models, however, suggested the role of abnormal cross-connections between the neural circuits. We quantitatively assessed eye movements in patients with pattern strabismus with a goal to delineate the role of neural circuits versus orbital etiologies.
We measured saccadic eye movements with high-precision video-oculography in 14 subjects with pattern strabismus, 5 with comitant strabismus, and 15 healthy controls. We assessed change in eye position in the direction orthogonal to that of the desired eye movement (cross-coupled responses). We used fundus photography to quantify the fundus torsion.
We found cross-coupling of saccades in all patients with pattern strabismus. The cross-coupled responses were in the same direction in both eyes, but larger in the nonviewing eye. All patients had clinically apparent inferior oblique overaction with abnormal excylotorsion. There was no correlation between the amount of the fundus torsion or the grade of oblique overaction and the severity of cross-coupling. The disconjugacy in the saccade direction and amplitude in pattern strabismics did not have characteristics predicted by clinically apparent inferior oblique overaction.
Our results validated primate models of pattern strabismus in human patients. We found no correlation between ocular torsion or oblique overaction and cross-coupling. Therefore, we could not ascribe cross-coupling exclusively to the orbital etiology. Patients with pattern strabismus could have abnormalities in the saccade generators.
模式性斜视描述的是垂直非共同性水平斜视。传统理论强调眼眶病因的作用,如眼底扭转异常和眼眶滑车排列不齐是模式性斜视的病因。然而,动物模型实验提示神经回路之间异常交叉连接的作用。我们对模式性斜视患者的眼球运动进行了定量评估,目的是阐明神经回路与眼眶病因的作用。
我们使用高精度视频眼动图测量了14例模式性斜视患者、5例共同性斜视患者和15名健康对照者的扫视眼动。我们评估了与期望眼球运动方向正交的眼位变化(交叉耦合反应)。我们使用眼底摄影来量化眼底扭转。
我们在所有模式性斜视患者中均发现扫视的交叉耦合。交叉耦合反应在双眼方向相同,但在非注视眼更大。所有患者均有临床上明显的下斜肌亢进伴异常外旋转斜视。眼底扭转量或斜肌亢进程度与交叉耦合严重程度之间无相关性。模式性斜视患者扫视方向和幅度的非共轭性没有临床明显的下斜肌亢进所预测的特征。
我们的结果验证了人类患者模式性斜视的灵长类动物模型。我们发现眼球扭转或斜肌亢进与交叉耦合之间无相关性。因此,我们不能将交叉耦合完全归因于眼眶病因。模式性斜视患者可能在扫视发生器方面存在异常。