Hosokawa Takayuki, Watanabe Masataka
Department of Physiological Psychology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science Tokyo, Japan ; Division of Systems Neuroscience, Tohoku University Graduate School of Life Sciences Sendai, Japan.
Department of Physiological Psychology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science Tokyo, Japan.
Front Neurosci. 2015 May 15;9:165. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00165. eCollection 2015.
How people work to obtain a reward depends on the context of the reward delivery, such as the presence/absence of competition and the contingency of reward delivery. Since resources are limited, winning a competition is critically important for organisms' obtaining a reward. People usually expect ordinary performance-reward contingency, with better performers obtaining better rewards. Unordinary reward contingency, such as egalitarianism (equal rewards/no-rewards to both good and poor performers), dampens people's motivation. We previously reported that monkeys were more motivated, and neurons in the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) showed higher outcome-related activity in a competitive than in a noncompetitive game (Hosokawa and Watanabe, 2012). However, monkey's behavior and LPFC neuronal activity have not been examined in a competitive situation with an unordinary performance-reward contingency. Also, the fixed performance-reward contingency in the previous study did not allow us to examine effects of win/loss separately from those of reward/no-reward on prefrontal neuronal activity. Here, we employed the egalitarian competitive situation in which both the winner and loser, or neither of them, got a reward as well as the normal competitive situation in which only the winner got a reward. Monkey's behavioral performance greatly deteriorated in trials with the egalitarian outcome conditions. LPFC neurons showed activities that reflected the normal or egalitarian outcome condition while very few neurons coded win/loss independent of reward/no-reward. Importantly, we found neurons that showed reward-related activity in the normal, but not in the egalitarian outcome conditions, even though the same reward was given to the animal. These results indicate that LPFC may play an important role in monitoring the current reward contingency and integrating it with the performance outcome (win-loss) for better performing the competitive game, and thus for better survival.
人们为获得奖励而付出的努力取决于奖励发放的情境,比如竞争的有无以及奖励发放的偶然性。由于资源有限,赢得竞争对于生物体获得奖励至关重要。人们通常期望普通的绩效-奖励偶然性,表现更好的人获得更好的奖励。不寻常的奖励偶然性,比如平均主义(对表现好和表现差的人都给予同等奖励/无奖励),会削弱人们的动机。我们之前报道过,猴子在竞争游戏中比在非竞争游戏中更有动力,并且外侧前额叶皮质(LPFC)中的神经元在竞争游戏中比在非竞争游戏中表现出更高的与结果相关的活动(细川和渡边,2012)。然而,尚未在具有不寻常绩效-奖励偶然性的竞争情境中研究猴子的行为和LPFC神经元活动。此外,之前研究中固定的绩效-奖励偶然性不允许我们将输赢的影响与奖励/无奖励的影响分开来研究前额叶神经元活动。在这里,我们采用了平均主义竞争情境,即赢家和输家都能得到奖励,或者都得不到奖励,以及正常竞争情境,即只有赢家能得到奖励。在平均主义结果条件的试验中,猴子的行为表现大幅下降。LPFC神经元表现出反映正常或平均主义结果条件的活动,而很少有神经元编码与奖励/无奖励无关的输赢情况。重要的是,我们发现即使给动物相同的奖励,在正常结果条件下表现出奖励相关活动的神经元,在平均主义结果条件下却没有。这些结果表明,LPFC可能在监测当前的奖励偶然性并将其与绩效结果(输赢)整合以更好地进行竞争游戏从而更好地生存方面发挥重要作用。