Heidrich Benjamin, Cordes Hans-Jörg, Klinker Hartwig, Möller Bernd, Naumann Uwe, Rössle Martin, Kraus Michael R, Böker Klaus H, Roggel Christoph, Schuchmann Marcus, Stoehr Albrecht, Trein Andreas, Hardtke Svenja, Gonnermann Andrea, Koch Armin, Wedemeyer Heiner, Manns Michael P, Cornberg Markus
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; HepNet Study-House, German Liver Foundation, Hannover, Germany; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Hannover-Braunschweig, Germany.
Gastroenterological Practice, Frankfurt, Germany.
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 9;10(6):e0128069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128069. eCollection 2015.
Although sofosbuvir has been approved for patients with genotypes 2/3 (G2/3), many parts of the world still consider pegylated Interferon alpha (P) and ribavirin (R) as standard of care for G2/3. Patients with rapid virological response (RVR) show response rates >80%. However, SVR (sustained virological response) in non-RVR patients is not satisfactory. Longer treatment duration may be required but evidence from prospective trials are lacking. A total of 1006 chronic HCV genotype 2/3 patients treated with P/R were recruited into a German HepNet multicenter screening registry. Of those, only 226 patients were still HCV RNA positive at week 4 (non-RVR). Non-RVR patients with ongoing response after 24 weeks P-2b/R qualified for OPTEX, a randomized trial investigating treatment extension of additional 24 weeks (total 48 weeks, Group A) or additional 12 weeks (total 36 weeks, group B) of 1.5 μg/kg P-2b and 800-1400 mg R. Due to the low number of patients without RVR, the number of 150 anticipated study patients was not met and only 99 non-RVR patients (n=50 Group A, n=49 Group B) could be enrolled into the OPTEX trial. Baseline factors did not differ between groups. Sixteen patients had G2 and 83 patients G3. Based on the ITT (intention-to-treat) analysis, 68% [55%; 81%] in Group A and 57% [43%; 71%] in Group B achieved SVR (p= 0.31). The primary endpoint of better SVR rates in Group A compared to a historical control group (SVR 70%) was not met. In conclusion, approximately 23% of G2/3 patients did not achieve RVR in a real world setting. However, subsequent recruitment in a treatment-extension study was difficult. Prolonged therapy beyond 24 weeks did not result in higher SVR compared to a historical control group.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00803309.
尽管索磷布韦已被批准用于2/3型(G2/3)患者,但世界上许多地区仍将聚乙二醇化干扰素α(P)和利巴韦林(R)视为G2/3型患者的标准治疗方案。快速病毒学应答(RVR)患者的应答率>80%。然而,非RVR患者的持续病毒学应答(SVR)并不理想。可能需要更长的治疗疗程,但前瞻性试验的证据不足。共有1006例接受P/R治疗的慢性丙型肝炎病毒2/3型患者被纳入德国肝病网络多中心筛查登记处。其中,只有226例患者在第4周时仍为HCV RNA阳性(非RVR)。24周P - 2b/R治疗后仍有应答的非RVR患者符合OPTEX试验条件,这是一项随机试验,研究额外延长24周(共48周,A组)或额外延长12周(共36周,B组)的1.5μg/kg P - 2b和800 - 1400mg R治疗。由于无RVR患者数量较少,未达到预期的150例研究患者数量,仅有99例非RVR患者(A组n = 50,B组n = 49)可纳入OPTEX试验。两组间基线因素无差异。16例患者为G2型,83例患者为G3型。基于意向性分析(ITT),A组68%[55%;81%]和B组57%[43%;71%]达到SVR(p = 0.31)。A组与历史对照组(SVR 70%)相比SVR率更高这一主要终点未达到。总之,在现实环境中,约23%的G2/3型患者未实现RVR。然而,后续在治疗延长研究中的招募困难。与历史对照组相比,超过24周的延长治疗并未导致更高的SVR。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00803309。